Agung Muda Patih
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Predicting Postoperative Mortality in Head Injury Patients: Evaluating the Accuracy of Rotterdam Score Fadhli Aufar Kasyfi; Agung Muda Patih; Erial Bahar
Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery
Publisher : Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/sjs.v8i1.118

Abstract

Introduction: Head injury remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally, necessitating accurate prognostic tools to guide clinical decision-making and inform patient outcomes. Rotterdam Score, a computed tomography (CT)-based scoring system, has shown promise in predicting mortality in head injury patients. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Rotterdam Score in predicting postoperative mortality in head injury patients undergoing surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 head injury patients who underwent surgery at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, between December 2023 and November 2024. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and CT scan findings were collected. Rotterdam Score was calculated for each patient, and its accuracy in predicting postoperative mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The study cohort comprised 37 (66.1%) males and 19 (33.9%) females, with a mean age of 31.8 ± 21.6 years. Mild head injury was the most common Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) classification (42.9%). The overall mortality rate was 17.8%. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.953 for the Rotterdam Score, with an optimal cut-off value of 4.5. Rotterdam Score demonstrated a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 97.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% in predicting postoperative mortality. Conclusion: The Rotterdam Score is a highly accurate predictor of postoperative mortality in head injury patients undergoing surgery. Its CT-based assessment allows for rapid and objective prognostication, aiding clinicians in risk stratification and treatment planning. Further research with larger and more diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and establish the generalizability of Rotterdam Score across different healthcare settings.
Accuracy of D-dimer as a Predictive Biomarker for Outcome in Head Injured Patients at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia Masdiyanto, Gayuh Prastya; Agung Muda Patih; Erial Bahar
Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery
Publisher : Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/sjs.v6i2.95

Abstract

Introduction: D-dimer reflects the upregulation of the overall hemostatic system upon admission. If D-dimer levels increase, coagulation disorders appear. This is considered a poor prognostic factor. High D-dimer levels reflect the severity of brain injury. Activation of systemic coagulation causes extensive intravascular fibrin deposition and a decrease in platelets and coagulation factors. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of D-dimer as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in head injury patients at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia. Methods: This study is a prospective prognostic test study to test the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer for prediction mortality in patients with severe head injuries at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital (RSMH) Palembang in the period June 2023 to August 2023. A total of 47 research subjects participated in this study. Results: Post 24-hour D-dimer levels have a cut-off point of 11.78 mg/L, which has high accuracy in poor outcomes. D-dimer levels after 5 days have a cut-off point value of 2.3 mg/L and have high sensitivity in predicting poor outcomes, and the value of the difference in changes in D-dimer based on poor outcome patients have a cut-off point of 3.33 mg/L, which has a high sensitivity in predicting a poor prognosis. Conclusion: D-dimer levels are quite accurate as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in head injury patients at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia.