Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Contemporary Legal Accountability Reform in Public Procurement: A Framework Integrating Ethical Norms and Anti-Corruption Mechanisms Jawade Hafidz; Muhammad Dias Saktiawan; Agus Prasetia Wiranto; Aditya Noviyansyah; Ahmed Kheir Osman
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10664

Abstract

Government procurement of goods and services is a strategic sector that is vulnerable to irregularities and corruption. Therefore, reforming legal accountability in this area is crucial to creating governance that is clean, transparent, and has integrity. This study offers an alternative approach to public procurement reform by integrating Islamic principles as an ethical and normative foundation for building a sound governance system and an anti-corruption framework. This research uses a normative-qualitative method, analyzing various legal documents, Islamic literature, and modern governance theories. It focuses on fundamental Islamic values such as ʿadalah (justice), amanah (honesty and responsibility), maslahah (public welfare), and hisbah (social oversight). These values are highly relevant for addressing accountability challenges in public procurement. The findings show that applying these principles can strengthen the ethical dimension of procurement regulations, improve transparency in the tender process, and clarify public accountability mechanisms. The integration of Islamic values is not intended to replace existing positive law but to enrich and complement the legal framework with a moral and spiritual approach rooted in Islamic legal tradition. Academically, this study contributes by providing a new conceptual framework that combines Islamic ethical norms with public governance and anti-corruption law. This approach creates space for dialogue between Islamic legal tradition and modern legal practice, offering a more holistic solution to corruption issues in public procurement. 
Asset Forfeiture Bill as a Challenge to Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture M. Rizal Bagaskoro; Irda Nur Khumaeroh; Agus Prasetia Wiranto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Asset confiscation without criminal punishment in civil forfeiture recognizes the principle of Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) which is a civil law instrument to confiscate assets/proceeds without going through criminal prosecution. The purpose of this writing is to design the mechanism and challenges of implementing NCBAF in the Asset Confiscation Bill. The research method used is normative juridical which emphasizes document studies or library research. The design of the PAS Bill mechanism in highlighting the traces of suspected assets is divided into several stages of practice that have been included in its content, namely starting from the tracing stage, blocking and confiscation, filing and submitting an application for asset confiscation, summons, examination in court, and asset management. The challenges of implementing NCBAF in the PAS Bill are the long process, the type which is an additional optional criminal offense, and the existence of a paradigm that pits NCBAF against the principle of the presumption of innocence so that they argue that NCBAF is contrary to Human Rights.