Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Sifra Zifora
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
RATIO DECIDENDI YANG DIBERIKAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NIET ONVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA) DALAM PERKARA MEREK GKRI: Decidendi Ratio  Given By Judge In The Verdict of “Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard” Case Ruling of The Trademark of The GKRI Sifra Zifora; Ning Adiasih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i1.22073

Abstract

A NO (Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard) verdict is caused by a formal defect in a lawsuit or the non-fulfillment of formal requirements and often occurs at the exception stage. If the formal requirements are unmet, the final decision will be impacted. So the formulation of the problem in this study is what is the ratio of decidences used by the judge in giving the NO Decision in the GKRI Trademark case. To answer this research, normative research is carried out which is descriptive analysis by sourcing secondary data, which is analyzed qualitatively, while conclusions using a deductive approach. The conclusion and the result of this study is that the judge granted the exception of the Defendant on the basis that the Plaintiff does not have legal standing to apply for trademark cancellation under Law Number 20 Year 2016, so the verdict of Unacceptable/NO is not appropriate, because trademark cancellation can be done by any interested party. In this case, the Plaintiff fulfills the formal requirements of filing a lawsuit, so it has no reason to be sentenced to NO.
Co-Authors Adiasih, Ning