Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA)
Milenia Ramadhani
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Politics in the Perspective of the Constitutional Court's Decision on Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates Milenia Ramadhani
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v3i4.13600

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding the age requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates is an important event in the context of political law in Indonesia. This event gave rise to various legal and political responses and consequences in this country. The article aims to explain the journey and dynamics of the Constitutional Court's decision along with the legal consequences and political impacts that result. The research method is normative juridical research and literature study. Data collection was carried out through library research and study of relevant legal sources. Data were analyzed qualitatively based on relevant legal and library sources. The research results show that the legal and political dynamics that occur in relation to the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the age requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates are part of a close legal and political relationship. The legal consequence that occurs is that everyone must implement the decision because the Constitutional Court's decision is final and binding and the technical regulations need to be prepared. The resulting political impact was a significant change in the political map. Key words: Constitutional Court, Political law, Presidential election.
Urgency of Medical Justice Post Law Number 17 of 2023 Concerning Health Milenia Ramadhani
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v3i4.13601

Abstract

Medical dispute resolution in Indonesia has become an important topic along with the increasing number of cases of medical malpractice and negligence. The recently passed Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health provides a new direction in regulating medical disputes, emphasizing non-litigation resolution through mediation, arbitration, and a restorative justice approach. However, although this law offers better protection for medical personnel and patients, the urgency of establishing a medical court remains necessary. This is because the existing medical dispute resolution procedures often do not create a sense of justice for both parties, both medical personnel and patients. A medical court that has a specialty is expected to ensure justice by involving judges and experts who understand complex medical issues. Thus, medical courts have the potential to become institutions that accommodate the need for fast, fair, and appropriate resolution of medical disputes in accordance with legal standards and medical professional ethics. This study aims to describe the resolution of medical disputes after the enactment of Law Number 17 of 2023 and analyze the urgency of establishing a medical court to improve the quality of the health law system in Indonesia.
Co-Authors