Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal HUMANIKA Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Al Fikrah: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam Al-A'raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat
Ulum, Muhammad Babul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES

 1 
An Examination of the Role of the Companions in Early Hadith Forgery Ulum, Muhammad Babul
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v14i1.44422

Abstract

The role that the Prophet's companions played in the campaign to fake hadiths is investigated in this article. There are two competing opinions regarding the genesis of the appearance of fake hadith, while both agree that political factors are the fundamental trigger. According to the first opinion, since the beginning of Islam, there have been incorrect hadith. The first group of Muslims, the Companions of the Prophet, are the ones who are at fault. The majority of Western Revisionist academics, led by Goldziher and Schacht, agree with this viewpoint; non-mainstream Islamic scholars, such Ahmad Amin and Abu Rayyah, endorse it. On the other hand, mainstream Islamic scholars, led by Muhammad Mustafa Azami, disagree, citing the Companions’ justification (‘adalah al-sahabah). This article attempts to evaluate the arguments using the abductive method. Opinions that correspond to the data are taken, which are contrary to the rejection. It follows that the view that the Companions were complicit in the hadith’s falsification is the one that is more grounded in scientific evidence. Conversely, the viewpoints that dispute it are founded solely on the widely accepted Companions’ conception of justice, which is better described as dogma than actual scientific knowledge.
Co-Authors Chandra, Widyawati Harun , Makmur Ishbah, Ali Falaqul Pajar, Dani Nur Suhendar Suhendar, Suhendar