Handayani, Ai
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Optimizing Cost Management in Dynamic Business Environments: An In-depth Analysis of Production Cost Budgeting, Considering Specific Elements and External Factors Suhidayat, Tatang; Ravitilova, Ravitilova; Handayani, Ai; Daniel Tambunan, Fransisco Wanviano
Maksi Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Audit, Pajak, Akuntansi Publik (AJIB) - Desember
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Akuntansi, Direktorat Pascasarjana, Universitas Sangga Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32897/ajib.2023.2.2.3238

Abstract

This research discusses the effectiveness of using budgets as a means of controlling production costs at PT. Sari Tuna Makmur in the 2017-2021 period. By examining the budget and realization of direct labor costs (salary costs), factory overhead costs, as well as differences in budgeted tuna production costs, this research aims to identify factors that influence variations between budget and realization. The research results show that the company is generally successful in controlling production costs. Although there are variations in direct labor costs during the COVID-19 pandemic, PT. Sari Tuna Makmur was able to achieve production costs that were lower than the budget in previous years. Internal factors such as business policies, production capacity, and production facilities, as well as external factors such as competition and consumer demand, play an important role in successful cost control. However, special challenges arise during the pandemic, where the decision not to reduce the workforce may result in direct labor cost deviations. Therefore, this research recommends increasing the accuracy of budget preparation and more detailed attention to factors that influence production costs, especially in unexpected situations. This research contributes to the understanding of production cost control strategies amidst the dynamics of the business environment. The practical implication is the need for companies to continue to optimize cost control strategies, consider changes in external conditions, and increase accuracy in preparing budgets to maintain the company's operational and financial sustainability.
The Influence of Current Ratio (CR), Total Asset Turnover (TATO), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), and Net Profit Margin (NPM) on Return on Assets (ROA) in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX for the Period 2021–2023 Handayani, Ai; Sopian, Dani
Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (September - O
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijefa.v6i4.5003

Abstract

The consistent performance of the manufacturing sector in the first quarter of 2023 has had a significant impact on Indonesia's economic development, particularly in the face of ongoing economic uncertainty. This study employs a quantitative research methodology, utilizing both descriptive and verification analyses. Its aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of company performance while examining the relationship between the Current Ratio (CR), Total Asset Turnover (TATO), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), and Net Profit Margin (NPM) on Return on Assets (ROA). Quantitative methods are applied to a defined population or sample by collecting data using pre-established instruments and analyzing the results through statistical techniques. Descriptive analysis is used to outline the identified issues, while verification analysis assesses the validity of predetermined hypotheses. The verification analysis in this study includes classical assumption testing and hypothesis testing. A purposive sampling technique was adopted, where samples were intentionally selected based on specific criteria determined by the researchers. Out of a total population of 78 companies, only 10 were selected as samples that met these criteria. The F-table value was 2.78, and the calculated F-statistic was 76.67. Since the F-statistic exceeds the F-table value, the null hypothesis (H?) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (H?) is accepted. This indicates that CR, TATO, DER, and NPM collectively influence Return on Assets. The coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.9842, suggesting that 98.42% of the variance in Return on Assets is explained by the independent variables CR, DER, TATO, and NPM, while the remaining 2.57% is attributed to other factors outside the scope of this study.