Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Wardani Rizkianti
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Computer Science & IT Health Professions Neuroscience Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection for Landowners in Forest Areas Utilized for Plantation Activities (Case Study: Supreme Court Decision Number 2929 K/PDT/2017) Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia; Wardani Rizkianti
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i1.50134

Abstract

Land ownership that has been legally recognized is entitled to legal certainty and protection. However, there is an issue where landowners do not receive legal protection as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 2929 K/Pdt/2017. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of legal rules for landowners in forest areas and the legal protection afforded to landowners in forest areas used for plantations, based on the judicial considerations in Supreme Court Decision Number 2929 K/Pdt/2017. This article employs normative legal research methods with a statutory and case approach. The research questions addressed in this article are the application of legal rules for landowners in forest areas and the legal protection of landowners in forest areas used for plantations, based on the judicial considerations in Supreme Court Decision Number 2929 K/Pdt/2017. The study concludes that Presidential Regulation No. 88 of 2017 serves as a reference for the application of legal rules for landowners in forest areas. Furthermore, the case in Supreme Court Decision Number 2929 K/Pdt/2017 did not take into account the fact that the Respondent in Cassation conducted business activities without holding a Right to Cultivate (HGU), resulting in losses for the landowners. Landowners should be granted legal protection, as the Respondent in Cassation lacked an HGU, which clearly violates legal provisions.
Analysis of Legal Protection For Household Workers Without Employment Contracts Farrel Farandy; Wardani Rizkianti
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i12.52551

Abstract

This study analyzes the urgency of legal protection for Domestic Workers (PRT) in Indonesia. The background is the significant increase in the number of domestic workers from 2015 to 2022. Despite their vital role, they are still vulnerable to violence and exploitation due to the lack of formal recognition and employment contracts. The main problem stems from the exclusion of domestic workers from the Manpower Law No. 13 of 2003 and the stalled ratification of the PPRT Bill since 2004. Using a normative juridical legal analysis method, this study concludes that the ratification of the PPRT Bill is a top priority to provide a legal basis, rights standards, and effective enforcement mechanisms for domestic workers' protection. It is also recommended that a comprehensive and transparent employment contract be formulated, supported by preventive and repressive efforts through public education, increased legal awareness, and strict supervision by the government and community participation, in order to realize justice and the welfare of domestic workers in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Farrel Farandy Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia