Aulia, Hana Farhanafiza
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Program "˜Inigenting' Generasi Berencana (Genre) untuk menurunkan stunting di Kubu Raya, Kalimantan Barat Aulia, Hana Farhanafiza; AP, Margaretha Andriani; Damaya, Tasya; Andini, Afnan Triyuning; Ng, Amelia; Marini, Marini; Abao, Antonia Sasap; Santri, Silvia
Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi
Publisher : Departemen Pendidikan Sosiologi FISHIPOL UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/dimensia.v14i1.73524

Abstract

Program Inigenting dimulai pada awal 2023 dengan fokus pada sosialisasi edukasi gizi dan pencegahan anemia pada remaja guna meningkatkan status gizi dan menurunkan angka stunting. Namun, program ini belum berkontribusi signifikan, terbukti dari meningkatnya angka stunting di Kabupaten Kubu Raya sebesar 8,8% pada 2023. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas program menggunakan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) oleh Stufflebeam dan Shienkfield dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui observasi dan wawancara. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa konteks, strategi, dan sumber daya program dikategorikan baik, sementara pelaksanaan dan manajemen program juga dinilai baik. Namun, kualitas peserta, tanggapan terhadap program, serta keberlanjutan program masih cukup baik. Kendala utama adalah cakupan program yang terbatas, durasi yang belum optimal, serta belum adanya upaya keberlanjutan yang jelas.The Inigenting program began in early 2023, focusing on nutrition education and anemia prevention among adolescents to improve their nutritional status and reduce stunting rates. However, the program has not had a significant impact, as stunting in Kubu Raya Regency increased by 8.8% in 2023. This study evaluates the program's effectiveness using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model by Stufflebeam and Shienkfield, employing a qualitative descriptive approach through observations and interviews. The evaluation results indicate that the program's context, strategies, and resources are categorized as good, while implementation and management are also rated positively. However, participant quality, program reception, and sustainability are only moderately effective. The main challenges include limited program coverage, insufficient duration, and the absence of clear sustainability efforts.