Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Biocentrism and its role in shaping conservation approaches in protected areas Suryo, Kevin Ibrahim
Journal of Critical Ecology Vol. 2 No. 1: (February) 2025
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/jcreco.v2i1.1740

Abstract

Background: This study explores the shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism in the context of protected-area prioritization in Indonesia, highlighting the influence of deep ecology and biocentrism on human-environment relationships. The primary objective of the study is to analyze the impact of deep ecology and biocentrism on conservation efforts in Indonesia, offering insights into the challenges of integrating these philosophies into environmental policymaking for long-term biodiversity conservation. Methods: This study employs a literature review methodology, analyzing existing research, philosophical frameworks, and case studies related to anthropocentrism, biocentrism, and ecocentrism in the context of environmental ethics and protected-area management. The review includes works on deep ecology, environmental ethics, and Indonesia’s specific environmental policies, drawing from both global and local perspectives to examine how these philosophies shape conservation strategies. Findings: Anthropocentrism, which views nature primarily as a resource for human use, has historically shaped environmental policies, often resulting in environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. In contrast, ecocentrism and biocentrism, which recognize the intrinsic value of all life forms, advocate for a more ethical and sustainable approach to conservation. As one of the most biodiverse countries in the world, Indonesia faces significant challenges in balancing development with biodiversity conservation, particularly in light of pressures from deforestation, agriculture, and urbanization. Conclusion: By adopting ecocentric values, Indonesia can ensure that its protected areas are managed in a way that promotes the sustainability of both human and natural systems. Novelty/Originality of This Study: This study introduces a novel approach by integrating deep ecology and biocentrism into protected-area prioritization in Indonesia. It offers fresh insights into how these ethical frameworks can reshape conservation policies for long-term biodiversity sustainability.
An ecosystem approach to circular economy implementation and efficiency: A global comparative analysis Suryo, Kevin Ibrahim
Social, Ecology, Economy for Sustainable Development Goals Journal Vol. 3 No. 1: July (2025)
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/seesdgj.v3i1.2025.1887

Abstract

Background: This study examines Indonesia’s adoption of circular-economy (CE) principles through an ecosystem lens and benchmarks national progress against leading global models. Method: Drawing on a review of academic articles, policy reports, and case studies, nine Indonesian initiatives are cataloged, ranging from Mycotech Lab’s biowaste valorization to PT Pertamina’s circular-carbon programs and community-driven collaborations like LTKL. Findings: These examples demonstrate localized successes in waste reduction, resource recirculation, and stakeholder engagement, yet they remain largely sector-specific and pilot-scale. In contrast, regions such as the European Union, China, and Finland operate under comprehensive, economy-wide frameworks with binding targets, dedicated financing mechanisms, and mandatory extended-producer-responsibility schemes. Quantitative metrics from Indonesian projects show material savings (e.g., 2,200 tons of plastic avoided by BulkSource) and emission reductions (e.g., 352,000 ton CO₂eq cut by Pertamina). Meanwhile, qualitative analysis highlights enabling factors, including multi-stakeholder collaboration and eco-innovation; as well as persistent barriers such as policy fragmentation, limited funding, and uneven data availability. A cross-case synthesis shows the absence of harmonized indicators and national coordination, which hinders scaling and aggregation of sectoral gains into systemic impact. Conclusion: It is concluded that Indonesia’s transition to a mature CE requires the establishment of a coherent national roadmap with clear targets, robust monitoring, and inclusive governance structures that integrate informal and rural actors. Strengthening financial instruments, such as green bonds and blended-finance vehicles, and embedding circular criteria in public procurement will be critical to mobilizing investment and promoting widespread adoption. By aligning policy, finance, and community engagement, progress toward systemic circularity can be accelerated. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study uniquely integrates ecosystem-based evaluation with quantitative and policy-level benchmarking to propose a strategic roadmap for Indonesia’s systemic CE transition.