Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Phenomenon of Sea Fencing in PIK 2 as a Sign of Government's Indecisiveness in Maintaining National Resilience Ahmad Rizal Roby Ananta; Devi Tri Berlian Syah; Zulfikar Erlangga
JURNAL PUSPAKA Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pusat Studi Pancasila dan Kebijakan
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pancasila dan Kebijakan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62734/jurnalpuspaka.v1i2.539

Abstract

The phenomenon of sea fencing in Pantai Indah Kapuk 2 (PIK 2) has raised concerns regarding the government's lack of decisiveness in upholding justice, humanity, and unity, which impacts national resilience. This study aims to analyze the relationship between this issue and aspects of maritime security, social justice, and economic stability, as well as to evaluate the government's role in managing coastal areas. The research was conducted in the PIK 2 area, which is part of a controversial National Strategic Project (NSP). The research employs normative legal methods with a conceptual and statutory approach, utilizing data collection techniques such as literature reviews of legal regulations, scientific journals, and international legal documents, including UNCLOS 1982. The findings reveal that the sea fencing in PIK 2, without considering the interests of coastal communities, violates the principles of social justice, exacerbates economic disparities, and threatens national unity. The study also identifies weaknesses in government oversight regarding the implementation of relevant regulations. It concludes that the government must take firm actions to review policies, strengthen oversight, and involve communities in decision-making to ensure that coastal area development aligns with Pancasila values and the goal of preserving national integrity. Keyword: Phenomenon, Government, National Resilience
Legal Politics Changes to The Periodization of The Term of Office of The Village Head Based on Law Number 3 of 2024 Second Amendment to Law Number 6 of 2014 Concerning Villages Ahmad Rizal Roby Ananta
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i4.51121

Abstract

This study examines the recent amendments in Law Number 3 of 2024, which revises Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, particularly regarding the extension of the village head’s term from 6 years with a maximum of 3 periods to 8 years with a maximum of 2 periods. The change, influenced by demands from village heads, has sparked significant debate due to the lack of clear legal justification supporting it. This research aims to assess the rationale behind this change and its potential implications on village governance, particularly its effects on leadership effectiveness, power concentration, and community impact. Using both a statute approach to analyze the legal texts and a conceptual approach to explore the broader political and governance implications, the study finds that while the extended tenure may offer continuity and more time for village heads to implement their programs, it also raises concerns about political dynasties and potential misuse of power. The study suggests that although longer terms may improve governance, careful consideration is needed to balance this with democratic values. The findings provide crucial insights for policymakers, underscoring the potential risks and benefits of this legal reform in strengthening or weakening local democratic processes and governance.
The Phenomenon of Sea Fencing in PIK 2 as a Sign of Government's Indecisiveness in Maintaining National Resilience Ahmad Rizal Roby Ananta; Devi Tri Berlian Syah; Zulfikar Erlangga
JURNAL PUSPAKA Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pusat Studi Pancasila dan Kebijakan
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pancasila dan Kebijakan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62734/jurnalpuspaka.v1i2.539

Abstract

The phenomenon of sea fencing in Pantai Indah Kapuk 2 (PIK 2) has raised concerns regarding the government's lack of decisiveness in upholding justice, humanity, and unity, which impacts national resilience. This study aims to analyze the relationship between this issue and aspects of maritime security, social justice, and economic stability, as well as to evaluate the government's role in managing coastal areas. The research was conducted in the PIK 2 area, which is part of a controversial National Strategic Project (NSP). The research employs normative legal methods with a conceptual and statutory approach, utilizing data collection techniques such as literature reviews of legal regulations, scientific journals, and international legal documents, including UNCLOS 1982. The findings reveal that the sea fencing in PIK 2, without considering the interests of coastal communities, violates the principles of social justice, exacerbates economic disparities, and threatens national unity. The study also identifies weaknesses in government oversight regarding the implementation of relevant regulations. It concludes that the government must take firm actions to review policies, strengthen oversight, and involve communities in decision-making to ensure that coastal area development aligns with Pancasila values and the goal of preserving national integrity. Keyword: Phenomenon, Government, National Resilience