Wiratama, Galih Putra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Korporasi yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup Wiratama, Galih Putra; Setiyono
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): November 2024, Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corporate crime lately has been seen by the public as the most serious and dangerous crimes than conventional crimes such as robbery or theft by force because the consequences of corporate crime is much more devastating than those caused by conventional crime, the purpose of this study describe and analyze criminal liability against corporations that commit crimes of environmental destruction,the formulation of the the second is how criminal liability against corporations that commit crimes of environmental destruction,the research method used is normative legal research.The first research results in UUPPLH in 2009 regulate the formulation of offenses, namely material offenses and formal offenses. Material offenses are found in Article 98, Article 99 and Article 112, while formal offenses are found in Article 100 to Article 111 and Article 113 to Article 115 of Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and management. While related to corporate regulation in environmental crimes stated in Article 116 paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) and Article 118 UUPPLH. The second is the recognition of corporations as legal subjects that can be criminally liable for environmental crimes is affirmed in Article 1 Number 32 of law no. 32 of 2009 concerning the protection and management of the environment, namely “everyone is an individual or business entity, both incorporated and unincorporated” Keywords: Criminal Liability,Corporate, Environment
Krisis Legitimasi Regulasi dalam Perlindungan Hak Digital pada Era Ekonomi Data dan Pengawasan Teknologi Pranowo, Fajar Aditya; Wiratama, Galih Putra
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/4k5svz08

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy and surveillance technologies has raised critical concerns regarding the legitimacy of regulatory frameworks in protecting digital rights. The increasing reliance on data-driven economy models has transformed personal data into a strategic asset, intensifying power imbalances between governments, corporations, and individuals. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy crisis in digital rights regulation by identifying key influencing factors and evaluating governance models to address these challenges. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing secondary data from legal documents, policy reports, and prior scholarly studies, and analyzing them through a qualitative-descriptive framework. The findings reveal that approximately 68% of regulatory challenges are associated with issues of over-surveillance and lack of transparency, while 54% are linked to regulatory lag in adapting to technological advancements. Additionally, around 61% of analyzed cases indicate significant asymmetry in power relations between stakeholders. The study also finds that the hybrid governance model demonstrates higher adaptability, with an effectiveness rate reaching 72% compared to centralized (58%) and decentralized (63%) approaches. These results indicate that digital surveillance practices, including AI profiling and mass surveillance, significantly undermine public trust in regulatory systems. This study contributes by proposing an integrated framework of regulatory legitimacy that emphasizes legality, accountability, transparency, and effectiveness, while highlighting the importance of adaptive and participatory regulatory approaches to ensure balanced protection of digital rights in the evolving digital ecosystem