Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Control Over the Activities of Public Administration Bodies (Prosecutor's Office, Police, Local Authorities): Legal Regulation, Administrative, Land, Financial Aspects and Prospects for Development Under the Martial Law of Ukraine Kalchuk, Oleksii; Davydenko, Viacheslav; Mozghovyi, Oleksandr; Hridina, Nataliia; Radchuk, Anatolii
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v13i1.44702

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to consider issues of administrative, land, financial regulation and foreign experience in controlling the activities of public administration bodies (prosecutor's office, police, local authorities). Main content. The main assessment measures are defined to ensure the effectiveness of control measures. This assessment is carried out in the following stages: determination of quantitative and qualitative parameters for evaluating the effectiveness of control; assessment of the competence of the control bodies or evaluation of the effectiveness of internal and external control, etc. Methodology: The methodological basis of the study is comparative legal and system analysis, formal legal method, interpretation method, hermeneutical method, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. Conclusions. It is concluded that to assess the effectiveness of regulatory authorities, it is proposed to improve the following criteria: quality and completeness, reliability of information received by regulatory authorities; timeliness of control, regularity of control, objectivity of control, simplicity of control measures.
Control over the activities of public administration bodies (prosecutor's office, police, local authorities): legal regulation, administrative, land, financial aspects and prospects for development under the martial law of Ukraine Kalchuk, Oleksii; Davydenko, Viacheslav; Mozghovyi, Oleksandr; Hridina, Nataliia; Radchuk, Anatolii
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Spring Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v13i1.44702

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to consider issues of administrative, land, financial regulation and foreign experience in controlling the activities of public administration bodies (prosecutor's office, police, local authorities). Main content. The main assessment measures are defined to ensure the effectiveness of control measures. This assessment is carried out on the following stages: determination of quantitative and qualitative parameters for evaluating the effectiveness of control; assessment of the competence of the control bodies or assessment of the effectiveness of internal and external control, etc. Methodology: The methodological basis of the study is comparative legal and system analysis, formal legal method, interpretation method, hermeneutical method, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. Conclusions. It is concluded that in order to assess the effectiveness of regulatory authorities, it is proposed to improve the following criteria: quality and completeness, reliability of information received by regulatory authorities; timeliness of control, regularity of control, objectivity of control, simplicity of control measures.Keywords: Administrative regulation, land law, legal principles, foreign experience, control, state administration, financial legislation, legislation, prosecutor’s office, police, local self-government.
International Perspectives on the Legal Framework Governing Prosecutorial Activities Leheza, Yevhen; Kalchuk, Oleksii
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Summer Edition
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v12i2.46140

Abstract

This article seeks to illuminate how prosecutors' offices are legally regulated internationally. Through a comparative analysis of various foreign prosecutors' offices, the study presents information regarding their position within the government, the models they utilise, and their core functions. This allows for understanding the role and evolution of prosecutors' offices in prominent countries today. Germany, for instance, has public prosecutors' offices operating within all levels of its general court system. The Federal Prosecutor General operates under the general oversight of the German Minister of Justice. Meanwhile, the French prosecutor's office is considered part of the executive branch and is subject to the authority of the Ministry of Justice. French prosecutors share a close relationship with the judiciary, undergoing similar training and often transitioning between roles as prosecutors and judges. Latvian law designates the prosecutor's office as a judicial body. This office independently oversees adherence to the law within its defined jurisdiction. The United Kingdom has no specific "public prosecutor's office" or equivalent.Keywords: prosecutor's Office; Organisation of the prosecutor's office; Models of foreign prosecutor’s Offices; Positioning of the Prosecutor's Office; Powers of Foreign Prosecutors