Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Ringan di Meja Hijau, Berat di Nurani: Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim dalam Korupsi 271 Triliun Harvey Moeis dan Runtuhnya Kepercayaan Publik M, Mulyadi; Pradiani, Canisya; Sagita, Nabila; Al Hafizh, Muhammad Fadhlan; Alfarizi, Rizqie Achmad; Y. S, Jevon Verrell; Ginting, Yovani Yolanda Putri; Putra R, Daffa Charisma
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15161565

Abstract

The corruption case involving Harvey Moeis, with state losses reaching 271 trillion rupiah, has brought sharp scrutiny to the integrity and professionalism of judges in Indonesia. The public's perception of a lenient verdict has triggered allegations of violations of the judicial code of ethics, potentially undermining public trust in the judiciary. This study aims to analyze in depth the alleged violations of the judicial code of ethics in this case, as well as its impact on public trust. The research method used is a case study with a qualitative approach, through the analysis of documents, news, and literature studies. The results of the study indicate indications of violations of the judicial code of ethics, reflected in the significant disparity between the prosecutor's demands and the judge's verdict. The implications of this case are extensive, not only damaging the image of the judiciary, but also threatening the rule of law and justice in Indonesia.
Policy-Based Local Economic Analysis: A Study of the Impact of the MBG Program on MSMEs at SMP Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung Maheswari, Indri; Prastian, Bagus Andika; Hidayatullaila, Shabrina; Ekanusa, Zoraya Kartika; Sagita, Nabila; Nandika, Bintang Putra
Pattimura Proceeding 2026: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference of International Conference on Business and Eco
Publisher : Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/pcst.2026.iconbe.p327-334

Abstract

This research examines the influence of the Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) program initiated by President Prabowo Subianto on the local school-based economy, particularly canteens and micro food enterprises. The research stems from the concern that although MBG aims to improve students’ nutritional intake and learning concentration, its economic impact on surrounding businesses remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore how the program affects business income levels, students’ purchasing behavior, and the economic sustainability of small traders operating near schools. A qualitative approach was employed through open-ended interviews with school canteen managers, micro-enterprise food vendors, and stakeholders involved in food distribution. The findings reveal that most micro-enterprises experienced a decline in income because students no longer purchase food independently as they did before the implementation of MBG. These results imply that the program should not only focus on nutritional benefits for students but also involve local economic actors in the food supply chain to ensure that MBG contributes simultaneously to student welfare and community economic sustainability.
Comparative Analysis of Backdoor Listing Regulations in Indonesia and Singapore: Implications for Investor Protection Sagita, Nabila; Satino, Satino
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51686

Abstract

The development of backdoor listing practices as an alternative to share listings has created new dynamics in capital market law, particularly regarding investor protection. In Indonesia, transactions that substantially resemble backdoor listings are not regulated by a special regime but are instead subject to general takeover and information disclosure provisions. In contrast, Singapore classifies similar transactions as reverse takeovers (RTOs) or very substantial acquisitions (VSAs), with approval and disclosure mechanisms equivalent to initial public offerings (IPOs). The research problem is to examine the differences in backdoor listing regulations and how these differences impact investor protection, particularly minority investors. This study aims to analyze the comparative regulations between Indonesia and Singapore and assess their legal implications for the effectiveness of investor protection. The method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach, aiming to compare backdoor listing regulations in Indonesia and Singapore. The results show that the Indonesian model is reactive and administrative, resulting in repressive investor protection. In contrast, Singapore's approach is preventative through pre-transaction approval and comprehensive disclosure, which strengthens ex ante protection. It concludes that strengthening the disclosure regime and preventive approval is necessary to enhance investor protection in backdoor listing practices in Indonesia.