Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analyzing HOTS Labeled Questions in An EFL Fifth Grade Elementary School Textbook Mahardhika, Galang Adhitia; Wirza, Yanty; Al-Kahfi, Faksi Rana; Mababaya, Ahmad Dindang
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1983

Abstract

The textbook used for fifth grade elementary students in an elementary school in Kuningan, West Java claims to offer Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) questions on the cover of the textbook and some questions have been labeled as HOTS questions. This research investigated the validity of this claim, analyzing the levels of cognitive domain of each question to determine whether the labeled questions are truly HOTS questions or Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) questions. This study conducted qualitative research with document analysis of HOTS labeled questions in the textbook entitled “Modul Pembelajaran Bina Prestasi Bahasa Inggris Kelas 5 Untuk SD/MI'' published by CV Larassukma which were analyzed using a revised Bloom’s taxonomy framework. Additionally, an interview with a fifth grade English teacher was conducted to explore the teacher's perspective regarding the HOTS questions in the textbook. The results revealed that most labeled HOTS questions are in fact LOTS questions (90.9%), with a majority covering Remembering (C1), followed by Understanding (C2), and Applying (C3). Only two questions were qualified as HOTS, particularly Creating (C6) questions (9.1%). The teacher's perspective mirrored these findings, indicating the inconsistency between the textbook's claims with its actual content, also discussing the textbook’s effectiveness and the teacher’s approach for implementing HOTS in the classroom. This study provides valuable insights for teachers, curriculum designers, textbook creators, and publishers, emphasizing the need for accurate representation of HOTS in educational materials to enhance the quality of future education.
A Comparative Analysis of the Philippine and Indonesian English Curricula at the Elementary Education Level Asyifa, Firly; Rodliyah, Rojab Siti; Amalia, Lulu Laela; Mababaya, Ahmad Dindang
IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) Vol 8, No 2 (2025): August
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/ijeca.v8i2.30813

Abstract

Curriculum plays an important role in education because it provides a structured framework for learning. Understanding how English curricula in different countries are constructed can be beneficial for improving educational quality.  This study, therefore, aimed to analyze and compare the Indonesian and Philippine English curricula, focusing on their construction, particularly at the elementary education level. The study employed document analysis through three stages. First, the data were coded using themes adapted from Tyler’s Rationale (objectives, design, scope and sequence, evaluation). Then, a comparative analysis was conducted to identify similarities and differences between the two curricula. Finally, the findings were interpreted by considering contextual and philosophical factors influencing each curriculum. Findings reveal significant differences: the Philippine curriculum introduces English from Kindergarten, highlighting its role as a second language that is vital for national development and global integration. It employs a structured approach emphasizing early exposure, higher-order thinking, and standardized assessments. By contrast, Indonesia introduces English in Grade 3, prioritizing foundational skills in the Indonesian language first; and emphasizing flexibility, formative assessments, and greater teacher autonomy, allowing contextualized adaptation to diverse student needs. Despite these differences, both curricula aim to foster communicative competence, critical thinking, and intercultural awareness, essential skills for 21st-century learners. The results bring to light the importance of context-sensitive curriculum development that balances international educational trends with local linguistic realities, contributing theoretically by clarifying how national contexts influence curriculum choices in ESL and EFL environments. Practically, it provides actionable insights for policymakers and curriculum designers aiming to develop adaptable, inclusive, and culturally relevant English programs in multilingual contexts.
Analyzing HOTS Labeled Questions in An EFL Fifth Grade Elementary School Textbook Mahardhika, Galang Adhitia; Wirza, Yanty; Al-Kahfi, Faksi Rana; Mababaya, Ahmad Dindang
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1983

Abstract

The textbook used for fifth grade elementary students in an elementary school in Kuningan, West Java claims to offer Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) questions on the cover of the textbook and some questions have been labeled as HOTS questions. This research investigated the validity of this claim, analyzing the levels of cognitive domain of each question to determine whether the labeled questions are truly HOTS questions or Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) questions. This study conducted qualitative research with document analysis of HOTS labeled questions in the textbook entitled “Modul Pembelajaran Bina Prestasi Bahasa Inggris Kelas 5 Untuk SD/MI'' published by CV Larassukma which were analyzed using a revised Bloom’s taxonomy framework. Additionally, an interview with a fifth grade English teacher was conducted to explore the teacher's perspective regarding the HOTS questions in the textbook. The results revealed that most labeled HOTS questions are in fact LOTS questions (90.9%), with a majority covering Remembering (C1), followed by Understanding (C2), and Applying (C3). Only two questions were qualified as HOTS, particularly Creating (C6) questions (9.1%). The teacher's perspective mirrored these findings, indicating the inconsistency between the textbook's claims with its actual content, also discussing the textbook’s effectiveness and the teacher’s approach for implementing HOTS in the classroom. This study provides valuable insights for teachers, curriculum designers, textbook creators, and publishers, emphasizing the need for accurate representation of HOTS in educational materials to enhance the quality of future education.