Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Power, Corruption, and Class Struggle: John Arden’s the Workhouse Donkey as a Political Examination of Local Government and Social Conflict in Post-War Sibgatulah Nazki PhD Scholar; Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat
International Journal of Global Sustainable Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijgsr.v2i12.2921

Abstract

This study examines John Arden’s play The Workhouse Donkey as a political drama. The purpose is to explore how the play exposes power struggles, corruption, and class conflict within local government. The research shows how Arden uses theatre to critique political systems. It highlights how the play raises social awareness about post-war Britain’s urban and social problems. First performed in 1963, The Workhouse Donkey reflects the political tensions of post-war Britain. Local councils faced criticism over urban redevelopment, housing shortages, and working-class displacement. Arden’s play presents a fictional town council. Personal ambition, greed, and rivalry lead to social decay. Arden reveals how bureaucracy and self-interest destroy public welfare. The play belongs to 1960s political theatre, which questioned authority and exposed social inequality. This research uses a qualitative approach. It focuses on close reading of The Workhouse Donkey. The study examines dialogue, characters, plot, and staging to find political themes. It also uses Arden’s essays and critical responses to explain the play’s context. The research applies political theatre theory and class analysis to understand Arden’s methods. The study finds that The Workhouse Donkey shows local government as a symbol of class struggle. Arden presents a system ruled by profit, competition, and survival. Political decisions ignore the social good. Through realistic dialogue and complex characters, the play exposes how corruption becomes normal. It shows how the working class is excluded from decisions that affect them. The analysis shows that Arden turns a council meeting into political conflict. His picture of council life reflects wider social divisions. The play’s structure, with fast dialogue and shifting alliances, shows the confusion of a broken system. The research proves that The Workhouse Donkey is more than local satire. It is a commentary on post-war Britain’s battles with power, urban change, and social justice. This study finds that The Workhouse Donkey is a strong example of political theatre. Arden uses local government to expose class conflict and system failure. The play is still relevant today. It reflects debates about political responsibility, corruption, and inequality. Arden shows how political systems protect the powerful. The weak are ignored. His play remains an urgent call for awareness and change
A Study of Edward Bond’s Concept of Rational Theatre and its Role in Contemporary Political Drama Sibgatulah Nazki; Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat
International Journal of Global Sustainable Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijgsr.v2i12.2922

Abstract

This study examines Edward Bond’s concept of Rational Theatre. It focuses on how his plays give a critical response to violence, injustice, and social systems. The purpose is to analyze Bond’s theory and see how it shapes both his plays and his wider ideas about theatre as a tool for social change. Edward Bond became an important playwright in post-war Britain. He challenged traditional theatre by bringing political ideas onto the stage. Bond worked during a time of state violence, capitalism, and moral decline. In response, he created the idea of Rational Theatre. This is theatre that uses reason and critical thought to reveal social problems and encourage audiences to reflect. His plays, such as Saved (1965) and Lear (1971), sparked debates about censorship, stage violence, and the political role of theatre. This research uses a qualitative method, studying Bond’s plays closely. It also reviews his essays and interviews. The study uses performance theory and political criticism to see how Bond creates Rational Theatre. It looks at his use of staging, language, character, and themes. The analysis shows that Rational Theatre uses strong images of violence, isolation, and social collapse. These force the audience to think deeply and respond morally. Bond’s plays do not allow passive viewing. Instead, they make people face the real causes of cruelty and injustice. Bond’s work shows that theatre can be a rational, public space for ethical thinking. His plays link personal suffering with larger social and political problems. He uses theatre to build critical awareness. In this way, Rational Theatre is not propaganda. It is a shared process of reasoning and reflection. Edward Bond’s Rational Theatre changes how we see drama today. It says theatre must help society question itself and imagine solutions. The study ends by saying Bond’s work is still important today. His ideas guide theatre makers who want to combine artistic form with political purpose, especially in times of social crisis