Guntara, Deny -
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Restorative Justice Paradigm Shift based on Perma No. 1 of 2024 to Realize Victim Recovery and Criminal Accountability Adimu, Siva Rizkia; Guntara, Deny -; Abas, Muhamad -
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.4933

Abstract

Restorative Justice is considered an appropriate formulation to take into account the circumstances of victims of criminal acts which in the criminal justice system are usually considered to be only oriented towards criminalizing the perpetrators of the crime. The problem in this article focuses on the restorative provisions in Perma No.1/2024 concerning guidelines for trying criminal cases according to restorative justice, and the shift in the paradigm of restorative justice in Indonesia. The method in the following research is to use normative legal research, by analyzing the provisions related to restorative justice. The results of the research and discussion explain that the idea of restorative justice in Perma No.1/2024 explains that restorative justice is carried out with the intention of restoring victims and does not aim to eliminate criminal responsibility carried out in the form of a judge's or court decision. The next research result is the shift in the paradigm of restorative justice in Indonesia, which was originally through Police Regulation No. 8/2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice and Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2021 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice, restorative justice is considered a mechanism for terminating cases, which according to the author can cause problems for both victims and for the interests of the law itself, so the implementation of restorative justice should be in accordance with Perma Number 1 of 2024 which has shifted its paradigm not only as a victim's recovery by not eliminating criminal liability through a decision, not terminating the case.
Normative Analysis of Freedom of Speech in Indonesia According to Positivism Theory Reviewed from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy Guntara, Deny -
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5050

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of freedom of speech in Indonesia within the framework of legal positivism theory, especially Hans Kelsen's perspective. Freedom of speech, which is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution, is often limited by laws such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Criminal Code (KUHP) which function to maintain public order and protect the rights of other individuals. This research method uses a normative legal approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, legal literature, and official documents. The results of the study show that the application of the positivism theory, which separates law from morality and emphasizes strict application of rules, often ignores the legal hierarchy that places the 1945 Constitution as the highest law. This results in law enforcement that tends to be rigid and less adaptive to dynamic social and political contexts, and can reduce the effectiveness of human rights protection, especially in the context of freedom of speech. This approach provides legal certainty but creates a mismatch between legal practice and constitutional principles and international standards.