Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.605
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan LamLaj
Muhammad Insan Tarigan
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab China Sebagai Negara Pihak Dalam Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Atas Tindakan Nahkoda Kapal Penangkap Ikan Berbendera China Gozal, Kenxie; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto; Muhammad Insan Tarigan
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 20 No. 2 (2022): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/qodiri.2022.20.2.126-140

Abstract

Indonesian Shipmen died on a Chinese ship. According to their information, while working on the ship, they received improper treatment such as working beyond reasonable time, eating and drinking that did not meet their needs. In addition they must also continue to work even in sick conditions by receiving improper wages. This article aims to analyze the state of China responsible for the actions of the captain and / or the ship company that did not carry out obligations in the 2006 maritime labor convention which was ratified by China since November 12, 2015. This study uses a normative juridical method, namely by conducting a library study of legal ingredients. The results of this study are that China as a State Party in the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention must carry out the obligations agreed at the convention based on the Pacta Sun Servanda principle. Failure to implement the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention which results in losses for the state or other citizens may lead to the responsibility of the Chinese state as a party to the convention. Ship companies are also responsible for deviating from the provisions in the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention in the form of improper treatment such as working beyond reasonable time, eating and drinking that is not in accordance with their needs. In addition they must also continue to work even in sick conditions by receiving improper wages.
MEASURING INDONESIA’S COMMITMENT TO REDUCING PLASTIC WASTE IN THE SEA THROUGH A LEGAL APPROACH Muhammad Insan Tarigan
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v6i1.113

Abstract

Indonesia is the second-largest producer of plastic pollution in the world after China. Based on the data in 2018, there were about 1.29 million tonnes plastic waste end up in the ocean per annum. With that regard, Indonesia needs to be responsible for the negligence in doing the international obligation to prevent, reduce, and manage the pollution that affect marine environment. The purpose of this research is to observe Indonesia’s commitment in reducing plastic pollution on marine environment by doing some legal approach. Therefore, this research conducted by normative juridical and using descriptive analysis. Data analysis that obtained is done through literature study. The conclusion of this research is that the commitment of Indonesian Government on preventing plastic waste in marine environment relatively needs to be improved. There are some of regulations which already targeted that has not established yet by Indonesian Government.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN KASUS PEMBANTAIAN RAS NUER DI SUDAN SELATAN DITINJAU DARI STATUTA ROMA 1998 Maria Hana Angelita; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto; Muhammad Insan Tarigan
CALYPTRA Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (November)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract —The international legal provisions for the crime of genocide are regulated in Article 5 of the 1998 Rome Statute. The massacre case that occurred in South Sudan can be categorized as a crime of genocide primarily because it specifically attacked a particular group, namely the Nuer Race. South Sudan is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute. Judicial developments regarding the case until 2019 have not been resolved even though action has been taken by the African Union, so it is indicated that there is a condition of 'Unwilling' by South Sudan regarding the resolution of the case. The aim of this research is to provide a juridical analysis of whether the ICC as a complementary judicial institution with national jurisdiction can play a role in resolving cases even though South Sudan is not a party state. The research results refer to Article 12 paragraph 3 of the 1998 Rome Statute that the ICC has the authority to play a role in resolving cases as regulated in Article 13 letter b of the 1998 Rome Statute through the 'proprio motu' authority to the ICC Prosecutor to carry out investigations. Keywords: rome statute 1998, icc, crime of genocide, massacre of the nuer race south sudan, proprio motu Abstrak—Ketentuan hukum secara internasional dari kejahatan genosida diatur dalam Pasal 5 Statuta Roma 1998. Kasus pembantaian yang terjadi di Sudan Selatan dapat dikategorikan sebagai suatu kejahatan genosida utamanya karena secara khusus menyerang terhadap suatu kelompok tertentu yaitu pembantaian Ras Nuer. Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak dalam Statuta Roma 1998. Perkembangan peradilan terhadap kasus hingga 2019 tidak terselesaikan meski telah ditindak oleh African Union, sehingga diindikasikan terdapat kondisi ‘Unwilling’ oleh Sudan Selatan terhadap penyelesaian kasus. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ingin memberikan analisis yuridis apakah ICC selaku lembaga peradilan pelengkap yurisdiksi nasional dapat turut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus meski Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak. Hasil penelitian mengacu pada Pasal 12 paragraf 3 Statuta Roma 1998 bahwa ICC memiliki kewenangan untuk ikut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 13 huruf b Statuta Roma 1998 melalui adanya kewenangan ‘proprio motu’ kepada Jaksa ICC untuk melakukan investigasi. Kata kunci: statuta roma 1998, icc, kejahatan genosida, pembantaian ras nuer sudan selatan, proprio motu
Co-Authors Gozal, Kenxie Maria Hana Angelita Wisnu Aryo Dewanto