Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Pratyaksa: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora
Aprilianto, Tedy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Populisme Kiri Dalam Kritik Demokrasi Liberal Pada Pemikiran Chantal Mouffe dan Ernesto Laclau Aprilianto, Tedy
Pratyaksa: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Samsara Institute Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji konsep populisme kiri dalam kritik terhadap demokrasi liberal berdasarkan pemikiran Chantal Mouffe dan Ernesto Laclau. Demokrasi liberal sering dianggap mengalami krisis legitimasi akibat ketimpangan sosial, politik, dan ekonomi. Mouffe dan Laclau menawarkan populisme kiri sebagai alternatif untuk menghidupkan kembali demokrasi dengan mendekatkan politik kepada rakyat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi pustaka model sistematis-reflektif untuk mengidentifikasi pemikiran  kedua tokoh. Hasil penelitian ini adalah temuan terkait dengan memahami tantangan dan peluang populisme dalam merespons krisis demokrasi liberal. 
Kritik Epistemologis Jacques Rancière atas Marxisme Struktural Louis Althusser Aprilianto, Tedy
Media: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Seminari Pineleng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53396/media.v7i1.762

Abstract

This paper critically examines Jacques Rancière rejection of Althusser’s concept of interpretation in epistemological rupture. Rancière critique stems from his rejection of hierarchical epistemological structures in the dichotomy between science and ideology. For Rancière, this approach actually constrains the division of social aesthetics of class outside of power as an ideological object, rather than  as an autonomous political subject. By examining the original works of Rancière and Althusser, the author uses a qualitative research model. Through this research model, the author analyzes Rancière's critique of Althusser in terms of elitism, epistemological break, and the separation of science and politics using hermeneutics. The results of this research contain hermeneutic arguments that emphasize that the interpretation of Marxismmust be grounded withinsocial aesthetics. This can happen because Ranciere attempts to present the progressive side of the Marxist tradition that has collapsed due to Althusser's concept of epistemological break.
Co-Authors