Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ANWARUL: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Dakwah
Samson Worku Teshome
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Fair Play—A Necessity in Higher Education Exit Exams: A Systematic Review Samson Worku Teshome
ANWARUL Vol 5 No 3 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/anwarul.v5i3.5520

Abstract

This systematic literature review critically examines the equity and inclusivity implications of exit exams in higher education, synthesizing evidence from 33 studies published between 1994 and 2024. While exit exams aim to standardize academic accountability and ensure graduate competency, their implementation often exacerbates disparities among marginalized student populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, low-income students, and individuals with disabilities. The review employs the PRISMA framework to analyze qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies, revealing that high-stakes exit exams frequently induce stress, narrow curricular focus, and disproportionately hinder underrepresented groups. Key findings highlight systemic inequities in exam design, accessibility, and washback effects on pedagogy, with marginalized students facing heightened barriers to success. The study identifies divergent outcomes across demographic groups, underscoring the tension between academic rigor and equitable assessment practices. Thematic analysis emphasizes the need for policy reforms, such as culturally responsive exam design, alternative assessment models, and institutional support mechanisms to mitigate adverse impacts. Recommendations include integrating formative assessments, adaptive testing, and holistic evaluation frameworks to balance accountability with inclusivity. This review contributes to the discourse on educational equity by advocating for systemic changes in exit exam policies and urging stakeholders to prioritize accessibility and fairness. By addressing these challenges, higher education institutions can foster inclusive environments that align assessment practices with the diverse needs of all students, ultimately promoting equitable academic and professional outcomes.
Fundamental Components of Undergraduate Exit Exams: A Systematic Literature Review of the Development, Administration, Feedback, and Remediation Samson Worku Teshome
ANWARUL Vol 5 No 3 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/anwarul.v5i3.6149

Abstract

Exit examinations in higher education serve as critical assessments to evaluate students’ readiness for professional practice upon graduation. This study systematically reviews how exit exams are designed, administered, and followed up with feedback and remediation, aiming to identify best practices and areas needing improvement. Using the PRISMA methodology, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases including PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar. Out of numerous articles screened, 22 studies were selected, covering disciplines such as medicine, pharmacy, aviation, and engineering. The analysis revealed that exit exams are most effective when aligned with curricular content and developed in collaboration with field experts. Key themes emerged around equitable exam administration, emphasizing accessibility for students with disabilities and diverse backgrounds. Post-exam processes such as timely and constructive feedback were found to be essential for student growth, while remediation efforts were most beneficial when focused on learning support rather than mere exam repetition. Despite these strengths, recurring challenges include inequitable exam design, insufficient institutional support, and limited access to preparation resources. To address these issues, the study recommends enhanced collaboration between institutions, students, and industry stakeholders; adoption of adaptable exam formats; and the development of robust support systems. Ultimately, exit exams should function not only as summative assessments but as formative tools guiding students toward lifelong learning and professional competence.
The Adverse Impacts of Exit Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review Samson Worku Teshome
ANWARUL Vol 5 No 3 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/anwarul.v5i3.6167

Abstract

Exit exams in higher education are widely implemented as tools for quality assurance, accountability, and the assessment of student learning outcomes. Despite their intended benefits, these assessments have been linked to various negative consequences affecting students, institutions, and educational systems. This systematic literature review critically evaluates the adverse impacts of exit exams by synthesizing peer-reviewed studies published between 1994 and 2024, following the PRISMA framework. The analysis reveals that exit exams disproportionately disadvantage marginalized student populations, contribute to increased dropout rates, and generate significant psychological stress, resulting in detrimental academic and emotional outcomes. Furthermore, these exams frequently exhibit poor alignment with curricular objectives, thereby undermining their efficacy. Thematic analysis identifies four primary adverse effects: psychological stress, inequitable access to educational opportunities, reduced graduation rates, and misalignment with educational goals. These findings highlight the urgent need for policymakers and educators to reconsider the design and administration of exit exams, emphasizing equity, fairness, and comprehensive assessment approaches. The review concludes by advocating for alternative quality assurance mechanisms that uphold accountability while minimizing harm to students.
Co-Authors