Herawati, Annisa Ardana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS FLEKSIBILITAS REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR KOLB Herawati, Annisa Ardana; Abdussakir, Abdussakir
JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) Vol 11, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Bhinneka PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29100/jp2m.v11i1.7077

Abstract

The ability to flexibly use mathematical representations is a crucial aspect of mathematics learning, particularly in solving problems through intra- and inter-representational transformations. However, the influence of learning styles on representational flexibility remains underexplored. This study aims to analyze students' mathematical representational flexibility in solving set problems based on Kolb's learning styles (Accommodator, Assimilator, Diverger, and Converger). A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving 12 eighth-grade students selected through a Kolb learning style questionnaire. Data were collected using a mathematical representation flexibility test, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. The research instruments included test sheets and interview guidelines, analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The findings revealed that Accommodator students excel in recognition and treatment but are limited in conversion, while Assimilator students demonstrate high flexibility in conversion. Diverger students are strong in recognition, whereas Converger students show excellent initial visualization but need reinforcement in treatment. Teachers are encouraged to implement learning strategies tailored to student's learning styles to enhance their representational flexibility. Future research should explore other mathematical topics or different educational levels.
Hambatan Epistemologi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Geometri Ditinjau dari Gender dan Resiliensi Matematis Herawati, Annisa Ardana; Anjany, Fadhlillah
Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 7 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55719/jrpm.v7i1.1536

Abstract

This study aims to explore students' epistemological obstacles in learning geometry by considering gender factors and mathematical resilience. This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The literature search process was carried out through systematic stages using four main databases: Google Scholar, SINTA, Scopus, and ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center). The literature search strategy was designed comprehensively by using a combination of specific keywords namely epistemological obstacles, geometry learning, mathematical resilience, gender differences, epistemological obstacles, geometry learning, mathematical resilience, and gender. The articles collected were those whose publication period spanned from 2015 to 2023. From the various articles, 25 articles were selected by researchers that were closely related to the keywords used. The article selection process was carried out through four main stages following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. In this study, it has been identified that students' epistemological barriers in learning geometry are strongly influenced by gender and mathematical resilience factors. Female students tend to show better mathematical communication skills, while male students often face challenges in following the steps of problem solving. In addition, mathematical resilience plays an important role in students' ability to overcome the difficulties they face. Students with high resilience are more able to persevere and try despite challenges, while students with low resilience tend to feel hopeless. Keywords: Epistemological Obstacles, Gender, Mathematical Resilience, Geometry Learning, Systematic Literature Review.