Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Berdaya Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Habibi, Iskan
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformulasi Proses Impeachment terhadap Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden yang Terbukti Melakukan Pelanggaran Sebagaimana Dimaksud dalam Pasal 7A UUD 1945 (The Reformulation of the Impeachment Process for the President and/or Vice President Found to Have Committed Violations as Referred to in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution) Habibi, Iskan; Nazri, Muhammad
Indonesia Berdaya Vol 6, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UKInstitute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/ib.20251111

Abstract

Abstract. This study examines the reformulation of the impeachment process for the President and/or Vice President in Indonesia to ensure legal certainty and justice within the presidential system. The research is based on legal uncertainty in the impeachment mechanism, which still combines political and legal elements, where the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is not automatically binding on the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impeachment mechanism in Indonesia, compare it with systems in other countries such as South Korea and Italy, and formulate an ideal concept to make the impeachment process more effective and aligned with the rule of law. The findings indicate that Indonesia's impeachment mechanism remains complex and tends to be more political than judicial. Therefore, a reformulation is necessary, including an amendment to Article 7B paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, ensuring that Constitutional Court decisions are final and must be implemented by the MPR. With these reforms, the impeachment mechanism is expected to better reflect the principle of checks and balances and strengthen the rule of law within Indonesia's constitutional system. Abstrak. Penelitian ini membahas reformulasi proses Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia dalam rangka memastikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam sistem presidensial. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada ketidakpastian hukum dalam mekanisme impeachment yang masih menggabungkan unsur politik dan hukum, di mana putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) tidak serta-merta mengikat Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR). Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengevaluasi mekanisme Impeachment di Indonesia, membandingkannya dengan sistem di negara lain seperti Korea Selatan dan Italia, serta merumuskan konsepsi ideal agar proses Impeachment lebih efektif dan sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme impeachment di Indonesia masih bersifat kompleks dan cenderung lebih politis dibandingkan yudisial, sehingga diperlukan reformulasi, termasuk amandemen Pasal 7B ayat (5) UUD 1945 agar putusan MK bersifat final dan wajib dilaksanakan oleh MPR. Dengan reformasi ini, diharapkan mekanisme impeachment dapat lebih mencerminkan prinsip checks and balances serta memperkuat supremasi hukum dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia.
The Efektivitas Pengawasan Keuangan Negara oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan sebagai Upaya Preventif terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Habibi, Iskan; Tjandra, W. Riawan
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1478

Abstract

Supervision of state finances plays a strategic role in preventing corruption practices that harm the economy and state finances. The Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK), as an institution granted constitutional authority, has the primary task of auditing the management and accountability of state finances, both at the central and regional levels. This article aims to analyze the effectiveness of the oversight conducted by the BPK in preventing corruption and to identify the challenges and obstacles faced, particularly related to resource limitations, follow-up on audit results, and synergy with law enforcement agencies. Through a normative approach by examining constitutional provisions, laws, and legal doctrines, it was found that although the BPK has procedurally carried out its functions of financial, performance, and investigative audits, its effectiveness is still not optimal. One of the main obstacles is the low level of follow-up on audit recommendations, as well as the absence of strict sanctions against parties who do not implement the recommendations. In addition, the inconsistency between BPK's findings and the outcomes of legal proceedings also raises doubts about the consistency of oversight. Therefore, there is a need for institutional strengthening, enhancement of auditor capacity, utilization of modern audit technology, and closer coordination with law enforcement agencies so that the oversight function of the BPK can significantly contribute to preventing corruption and realizing good governance.
Co-Authors Nazri, Muhammad W. Riawan Tjandra, W. Riawan