Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Strukturasi dan Penguatan Ketahanan Desa: Tinjauan Hukum Atas Implementasi Sistem Pemerintahan Desa Berbasis Elektronik Nagara, Airlangga Surya; Maulana, Reza Ilham
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i1.150-179

Abstract

The modernization of village governance holds significant potential to enhance efficiency, transparency, and active community participation through Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 and Regulation of the Minister of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration No. 22 of 2019. However, its implementation faces challenges due to resistance rooted in social and cultural norms. This study aims to strengthen the structural resilience of villages through a socio-legal positivist approach, with a primary focus on reinforcing the legal system.The method employed in this research is a socio-legal approach using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) analysis technique. The findings reveal that technological changes in governance systems influence the structural relationship between agency and structure. The implementation of e-government as a means to enhance village resilience can be achieved through clarity in both structural and legal frameworks, utilizing socio-legal positivist analysis to address issues of social, cultural, and legal policy disparities.The conclusion drawn from this study indicates that village resilience can be reinforced through e-government, which depends on the readiness of social infrastructure and legal comprehension that reflects the local community’s cultural values.
Sufficiency and the Shifting Dynamics of Efficiency: A Political Economy and Jurisprudence Review Efendi, Muhammad Syarahil Mutianwar; Maulana, Reza Ilham
Mimbar Hukum Vol 37 No 1 (2025): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v37i1.18391

Abstract

Abstract Sufficiency is a concept that challenges efficiency, a rational consequence that hitherto grows within the logic of capitalism. Without efficiency, the structure of capitalism collapses, as it has become the ontological prerequisite sustaining the structure of production, distribution, and accumulation of capital; Contrarily, efficiency leads to the collapse of the Earth’s systems, as it inherently overlooks ecological boundaries and fails to recognize the limits of nature as a fundamental principle in economic activity. This article examines, from a normative perspective, the transformative potential of sufficiency through an epistemic assertion within political economy and jurisprudence. It explores how this concept can redefine the relationship between economics, ethics, and ecology, advocating for a more balanced approach to socio-ecological justice that benefits both humans and nature. Intisari Sufisiensi adalah sebuah konsep yang menantang prinsip efisiensi, sebuah konsekuensi rasional yang sampai saat ini tumbuh dalam logika kapitalisme. Tanpa efisiensi, struktur kapitalisme akan runtuh, karena telah menjadi prasyarat ontologis yang menopang struktur produksi, distribusi, dan akumulasi kapital; sebaliknya, efisiensi menyebabkan runtuhnya sistem bumi karena secara inheren mengabaikan batas-batas ekologis dan gagal mengenali batas-batas alam sebagai prinsip fundamental dalam aktivitas ekonomi. Artikel ini mengkaji, dari perspektif normatif, potensi transformatif dari konsep sufisiensi melalui argumentasi epistemik dalam ekonomi politik dan filsafat hukum. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana konsep sufisiensi dapat mendefinisikan kembali hubungan antara ekonomi, etika, dan ekologi, mengadvokasi pendekatan yang lebih setimbang terhadap keadilan sosio-ekologis bagi manusia dan alam.
Dampak Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif terhadap Korban dan Pelaku Nagara, Airlangga Surya; Adi, Elizabeth Ayu Puspita; Maulana, Reza Ilham
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 13, No 2: Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v13i2.107070

Abstract

The paradigm shift in Indonesian criminal law toward restorative justice (RJ) reflects an effort to address the shortcomings of the retributive system, which focuses solely on punishment. The central issue in this study is how the policy of terminating prosecution based on restorative justice affects the position of victims and offenders within the criminal justice system. This research aims to analyze the normative and empirical impacts of such policy on substantive justice, as well as to identify the potential and challenges of its implementation. The method employed is normative juridical, using both conceptual and case approaches, supported by systematic literature analysis guided by the PRISMA framework. The findings indicate that RJ provides a space for dialogue-based resolution, reduces over-criminalization, and strengthens offender reintegration without negating victims’ rights. However, its practical application still faces obstacles such as disparities in institutional understanding, potential pressure on victims, and regulatory inconsistencies. Case studies in East Flores and Tojo Una-Una reaffirm the effectiveness of RJ in strengthening social cohesion. It is concluded that RJ is not merely an alternative, but an integral component of criminal law reform in Indonesia that is just, inclusive, and transformative, aligned with local values, the principle of opportunity, and the theories of Zehr and Braithwaite.