<![CDATA[The transition to digital platforms in the media industry requires robust systems to ensure efficiency and user satisfaction. As with Digital Iklan Radar Banjarmasin, the Newspaper ad submission and payment website, there is a need for evaluation to comprehensively ensure software feasibility and quality. This research evaluates the quality of the Newspaper ad submission and payment website using the McCall and PIECES frameworks, comparing their strengths and identifying areas for improvement. This research contributes to determining the most suitable evaluation methods for such types of websites while offering actionable insights for developers to improve the quality of systems and services. Data collection involved online surveys with 106 respondents and 38 Likert-scale questions mapped to McCall and PIECES frameworks. Statistical tests, including validity, reliability, and an independent t-test, were applied to compare results. McCall's evaluation rated the system at 68% (Good), with low scores in Usability (38.5%), Reliability (36.77%), and Efficiency (38.15%), indicating areas needing significant improvement. PIECES evaluation scored 80.4% (Good), with Performance (81%) and Service (82.39%) rated Very Good, though Control and Security (78.55%) required enhancement. Statistical analysis with independent t-test confirmed significant differences between the two methods, indicating that both methods measure aspects of software quality from different perspectives, thus providing complementary insights for evaluation. The study highlights the complementary nature of McCall and PIECES in software quality evaluation. Recommendations include improving usability, system stability, and security for better user experiences. Future research should involve broader demographic samples and different system types to validate findings and enhance generalizability.]]>
