Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN BADAN MUSYAWARAH KAMPUNG DALAM PENGAWASAN KINERJA PEMERINTAH KAMPUNG IFIA-FIA Rifai Nur Syabana; Yosephina Ohoiwutun; Untung Muhdiarta; Nur Aedah; Hiskia C.M. Sapioper; Dorthea Renyaan
JURNAL KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK Vol 9 No 1 (2026): April 2026 [in press]
Publisher : Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31957/jkp.v9i1.5551

Abstract

Supervision of village governance is an important aspect in achieving accountability and transparency. The Village Consultative Body (Bamuskam) has a strategic role in supervising the performance of the Village Government, particularly in the stages of planning, implementation, and reporting. However, in practice, this role has not yet been optimally carried out in Ifia-Fia Village, Arso Barat District, Keerom Regency. This study aims to analyze the role of Bamuskam in supervising the performance of the Ifia-Fia Village Government and to identify the factors influencing the implementation of such supervision. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving informants from Bamuskam members, village government officials, and the community. Data analysis was conducted through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the supervisory role of Bamuskam has not been optimally implemented. In the planning stage, supervision has not been effective due to the absence of Village Deliberation as a key stage, resulting in the failure of preliminary supervision. In the implementation stage, supervision remains individual, not institutionally coordinated, and not comprehensive. Meanwhile, in the reporting stage, supervision has not been conducted due to the absence of accountability reports, evaluation forums, and adequate feedback mechanisms. The influencing factors include limited human resource capacity, insufficient understanding of regulations, low community participation, and unstable village governance conditions. Thus, it can be concluded that Bamuskam supervision has not been effective, systematic, and sustainable in supporting accountable, participatory, and transparent village governance.
Analisis Kebijakan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan di Kabupaten Mamberamo Tengah Nur Aedah
JURNAL EKOLOGI BIROKRASI Vol 14 No 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31957/jeb.v14i1.5967

Abstract

This study analyzes the road infrastructure development policy for the Kobakma–Ilugwa route in Mamberamo Tengah Regency, Highland Papua. The route supports access to markets, schools, and health services, yet remains partly inadequate. The research employed a qualitative case study design. Data were collected through interviews with local government policy officials, field supervisors, contractors, and community leaders, together with direct observation and document review. The analysis applied Van Meter and Van Horn’s six implementation variables and compared sources. The findings indicate that implementing actors understand the development goals and that local communities support the project, while construction has proceeded in stages. Limited funding, heavy equipment, technical personnel, and capacity to transport materials have slowed progress. Mountainous terrain, muddy sections, heavy rainfall, and landslide risks have further disrupted fieldwork. Communication among implementing actors and the provision of information to residents have remained inconsistent, while customary land issues require consultation with relevant rights holders. The local government has sought to adjust schedules, strengthen coordination and supervision, and manage available resources more carefully. The study concludes that administrative commitment and community support must be accompanied by planning that reflects actual costs, logistics, environmental conditions, and social agreements. Future policy implementation should prioritize the sections that most severely restrict travel, establish realistic phased financing, and involve communities in monitoring progress. Policy success should be assessed through reliable access along the route rather than the length of road completed alone. These findings inform improvements to road development policy in mountainous regions with limited access and resources.