Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Bisariyadi, B
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
DISTINGUISHING CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN JUDICIAL REVIEW CASES: A BLURRED BOUNDARY LINE Bisariyadi, B
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 18, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.1980

Abstract

The establishment of the Constitutional Court to hold power of reviewing the constitutionality of Laws raises discourse on the distinction between constitutional interpretation and statutory interpretation. In judicial review cases, the separation, either in common law or civil law tradition, between the two interpretations is not clearly distinguished. The Indonesian Constitutional Court, in judicial review decisions, shows that the Court does not only interpret constitutional provision. In a number of decisions, the Court has put more emphasis on the use of statutory interpretation. The essay discusses the Constitutional Court practice in the use of constitutional interpretation and statutory interpretation on judicial review cases.Keywords: Constitutional Court, judicial review, constitutional interpretation, statutory interpretation.
Co-Authors