Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology
Yusuf Wahyu Mandaya
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Library & Information Science

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology

 1 
Evaluation of Success Factors for Academic Information System Applications in Higher Education Using the Hot-Fit Model Sry Dhina Pohan; Ircham Ali; Siska Ayu Widiana; Supriyanto; Yusuf Wahyu Mandaya
Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jaist.v7i1.20847

Abstract

This research explored the adoption of the HOT-Fit paradigm and its influence on the success of an academic information system application in higher education. Using the PLS-SEM multivariate data analysis approach, the HOT-Fit model was evaluated in order to investigate the foundations of theory from a prediction standpoint. This was done to find out more about the model's potential applications. The HOT-Fit method takes various elements into account when performing a system analysis. Humans, organizations and technology are integrated elements and must be considered for the continued existence of an operating entity. This study uses hypothesis testing on a total of ten hypotheses to show the relationship between Academic Information System variables. The results show that six of the investigated hypotheses have a significant effect, while the other four are discarded because they are not relevant. 7.344 is the variable value of customer satisfaction. Program Features and Benefits The use of a variable with a value of 0.426 contributes little to the overall clarity of the situation. Based on the results of demo data processing, 121 participants (76.58%) reported good results, 13 (8.13%) rated this system as good, and 24 (15.19%) rated it as bad, resulting in a disparity between user expectations and the situation.
Co-Authors Ircham Ali Pohan, Sry Dhina Siska Ayu Widiana Supriyanto