Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Keadilan
Syofyan Hadi
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Upholding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Through the Difference Principle Miftakhul Shodikin; Syofyan Hadi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i1.12135

Abstract

The right to work is a right for every citizen to earn a decent living for humanity. However, injustice is still often felt by people with disabilities who often face challenges in accessing this right. The difference principle asserts that inequality is only acceptable if it provides the greatest benefit to the most disadvantaged. This principle is an appropriate analytical tool to evaluate how employment policies in Indonesia have succeeded in minimizing the inequalities faced by persons with disabilities. Therefore, this research aims to explain the difference principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are most disadvantaged or marginalized. This study aims to analyze the legal issues through a normative legal lens, incorporating both statutory and conceptual analysis. Through normative analysis and deductive reasoning, the result of this research is that the regulation of the right to work for persons with disabilities is not yet optimal in accordance with the difference principle. Such as special quota policies that are not accompanied by strict sanctions, training, and job fairs that are still general and have yet to fully meet the unique requirements of individuals with disabilities. The inclusive recruitment process, which should be a must, is a phrase in the article that regulates the possibility (optional) instead of an obligation (mandatory). Meanwhile, the limited authority of the Disability Service Unit (ULD) in the employment sector and the weak institutional structure of the National Commission on Disability (KND), which is far from independent, include the barriers that individuals with disabilities encounter in accessing their right to employment.
Justice in the Internet Context: The Protection of Freedom of Expression Online Post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Syofyan Hadi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.131947

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze justice on the Internet post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024 which provide strengthening of protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study found that restrictions on freedom of expression on the Internet in the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction are problematic because they are irrational, unfair, disproportionate, and tend to conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Through Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024, the Constitutional Court has realized justice on the Internet by providing proportional protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. The decision provides freedom for everyone to express themselves on the Internet, such as conveying criticism, provided that their expression does not degrade the dignity or good name of others. Government institutions, professions, or positions are excluded from subjects that can be victims of defamation. The government can no longer prosecute citizens who criticize the policies it has taken. The decision provides guidelines for enforcing the law against violations of freedom of expression on the Internet.
Redesigning the Authority of Autonomous Region in Geothermal Management: a Constitutional Justice Perspective Syofyan Hadi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v19i1.132755

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the authority of autonomous regions in geothermal management and to find a fair redesign of the division of geothermal management authority to autonomous regions. This study is a legal study with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. The primary and secondary legal materials that have been collected are then analysed normatively. The results of the study found that through the principle of the broadest possible autonomy, the central government decentralizes some concurrent government affairs to autonomous regions. One of the concurrent affairs is geothermal affairs. However, Law No. 23 of 2014 regulates the centralization of geothermal permit issuance, so that it only becomes the authority of the Central Government. In fact, this centralization is strengthened by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 11/PUU-XIV/2016. In fact, this causes injustice to autonomous regions. After all, it is contrary to Article 18 paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) and Article 18A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and is inconsistent with Law No. 23 of 2014 because it only uses the principle of national strategic interests. Therefore, as an effort to provide justice for the regions, the regulation needs to be redesigned by dividing the authority to grant geothermal permits among the regions. The division of authority is carried out using the principles of accountability, externality, and efficiency by considering the location/place of the geothermal permit, users, and benefits/negative impacts of granting geothermal permits, as well as efficiency in the implementation of granting geothermal permits.
Co-Authors Miftakhul Shodikin