This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Concept and Meaning of the Procedural Control of the Head of an Investigative Body in Criminal Proceedings Smeshkova, Liliya; Moskovtseva, Kristina; Potapov, Vasily; Grinenko, Aleksandr; Ermakov, Sergey
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 12, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.42518

Abstract

In the article, the authors consider the most pressing issues relating to the conceptual framework of procedural control of the head of an investigative body and its importance in pre-trial criminal proceedings. The authors distinguish the correlation between the procedural control and departmental control exercised by the head of the investigative body. The authors substantiate that the science of criminal procedure needs theoretical consolidation of the correlation between procedural and departmental control, which is correlated as the general with the particular, where procedural control is understood as a special case of departmental control. In conclusion, based on the features highlighted by the authors, the author's wording of the concept of procedural control, which should be understood as based on the norms of criminal procedure law activity of the head of the investigative authority, carried out during the pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases, to implement the purpose of criminal proceedings, identifying, eliminating and preventing violations of criminal procedure and other legislation by the investigator, subject to the limits determined by procedural independence.
The Investigator’s Actions to Compensate for the Harm Caused by the Crime in Determining the Form of Terminating the Preliminary Investigation Ivanov, Dmitriy; Potapov, Vasily; Vasyukov, Vitaliy; Artemova, Valeriia; Alimamedov, Elmir
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v11i2.34006

Abstract

Investigations into the termination of preliminary criminal investigations traditionally encompass two forms: closing a criminal case and concluding the preliminary investigation through an indictment for prosecutor transfer. Prior research has examined these processes, emphasizing the importance of procedural correctness and legal compliance. However, existing studies fall short in elucidating the investigator's actions concerning harm compensation during preliminary investigation termination. The purpose of this study was to explore the investigator's actions to ensure compensation for harm caused by a criminally punishable act during the termination of the preliminary investigation. The authors employed a holistic approach, including the general scientific method, systematic analysis, synthesis, and comparative legal analysis. The results revealed that regardless of the form of termination, measures for compensating victims of criminal acts must be taken. These include appealing against unlawful decisions, and preparing claims for rights protection and compensation in civil proceedings. Compensation for harm remains a priority throughout pre-trial proceedings, even after termination.
The Concept and Meaning of the Procedural Control of the Head of an Investigative Body in Criminal Proceedings Smeshkova, Liliya; Moskovtseva, Kristina; Potapov, Vasily; Grinenko, Aleksandr; Ermakov, Sergey
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.42518

Abstract

In the article, the authors consider the most pressing issues relating to the conceptual framework of procedural control of the head of an investigative body and its importance in pre-trial criminal proceedings. The authors distinguish the correlation between the procedural control and departmental control exercised by the head of the investigative body. The authors substantiate that the science of criminal procedure needs theoretical consolidation of the correlation between procedural and departmental control, which is correlated as the general with the particular, where procedural control is understood as a special case of departmental control. In conclusion, based on the features highlighted by the authors, the author's wording of the concept of procedural control, which should be understood as based on the norms of criminal procedure law activity of the head of the investigative authority, carried out during the pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases, to implement the purpose of criminal proceedings, identifying, eliminating and preventing violations of criminal procedure and other legislation by the investigator, subject to the limits determined by procedural independence.