Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Law Research Review Quarterly
Ali Masyhar Mursyid
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Jurnalis Atas Pemberitaan Identitas Anak Korban Asusila: Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Joko Susanto; Ali Masyhar Mursyid; Anis Widyawati; Indah Sri Utari; Falikha Ardiyani Zjubaidi
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v5i7.2616

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji tentang isu penting terkait kebebasan pers dan perlindungan identitas anak korban asusila. Dalam konteks hukum pidana, pertanyaan mengenai tanggung jawab pidana bagi jurnalis atas pelanggaran privasi identitas anak korban asusila menjadi sangat relevan dalam era media modern. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan perbandingan regulasi hukum di Indonesia dan Malaysia terkait pertanggungjawaban pidana jurnalis dalam kasus pemberitaan identitas anak korban asusila. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Indonesia dan Malaysia memiliki peraturan hukum yang berbeda terkait pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi jurnalis, keduanya memiliki prinsip-prinsip yang serupa dalam perlindungan identitas anak korban asusila. Evaluasi mendalam terhadap kasus-kasus yang telah terjadi menunjukkan bahwa implementasi hukum terkait pelanggaran tersebut masih memiliki celah yang perlu diperbaiki. Diperlukan pendekatan yang lebih holistik dan komprehensif dalam menangani kasus-kasus sensasionalisme media yang merugikan anak korban asusila. Berdasarkan analisis ini, implementasi regulasi yang lebih ketat dan sanksi yang tegas terhadap pelanggaran hukum terkait pemberitaan identitas anak korban asusila akan menjadi langkah efektif dalam mencegah penyalahgunaan kebebasan pers demi kepentingan publik. Melalui pemahaman mendalam terkait perbandingan hukum antara Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam kasus pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi jurnalis atas pemberitaan identitas anak korban asusila, diharapkan dapat lebih meningkatkan kesadaran akan pentingnya perlindungan anak korban asusila dan mendorong perbaikan perundang-undangan guna mencapai keadilan yang lebih baik dalam konteks ini.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN CORRUPTION CASES: A STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE CRISIS IN THE PT. TIMAH INDONESIA CASE: DIMENSI KONSTITUSIONAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI: STUDI KRISIS KEADILAN KONSTITUSIONAL DALAM KASUS PT. TIMAH INDONESIA Tiara Maharani; Ali Masyhar Mursyid
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/jcls.v5i1.145

Abstract

The enforcement of anti-corruption law in Indonesia not only concerns the punishment of the main perpetrators but also the protection of the judicial process itself. One of the serious threats to the integrity of the judicial system is obstruction of justice, which interferes with the process of investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of corruption cases. Article 21 of the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law regulates obstruction of justice as an independent offense intended to safeguard the judicial process. However, its practical enforcement often reveals inconsistencies that undermine constitutional justice. This article analyzes obstruction of justice from the perspective of constitutional law by positioning it as a constitutional offense that threatens the fundamental principles of the rule of law and judicial independence. Using a normative juridical method with constitutional, statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research examines the PT Timah corruption case, particularly the decision of the Pangkalpinang District Court concerning obstruction of justice committed by Toni Tamsil. The findings reveal a significant disparity between the normative framework of Article 21 of the Anti-Corruption Law and its application in judicial practice. The relatively light sentence imposed in the case reflects a broader crisis of constitutional justice in the enforcement of obstruction of justice in Indonesia. The study argues that obstruction of justice should be treated as a constitutional offense because it directly undermines the integrity of the judiciary, weakens anti-corruption efforts, and erodes public trust in the rule of law. Strengthening constitutional interpretation in the enforcement of obstruction of justice is therefore necessary to ensure the protection of judicial independence and the effectiveness of corruption eradication.
Legal Analysis of Cohabitation and Adultery Delict in Law No. 1 of 2023 On the Criminal Code Kaila Intan Fatihah; Ali Masyhar Mursyid
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v12i2.42076

Abstract

This study examines the criminalization of adultery and cohabitation in Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (KUHP), focusing on the effectiveness of the absolute nature of the delict under Articles 411 and 412. The main problem identified is the restriction of the subject of the complaint to only include the immediate family, thus creating a legal impasse in accommodating living law, as well as the communal community's unrest over violations of decency in their neighborhood. The purpose of this study is to formulate an ideal formulation of more adaptive law enforcement through normative legal research methods with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that restricting the right to complain risks triggering vigilante justice (eigenrichting), thus requiring a reorientation of the paradigm through the reconstruction of the nature of the delict into a relative complaint delict. In conclusion, this study offers an ideal formulation in the form of expanding the legitimacy of complainants to include four main pillars, namely husband or wife, parents, children, and traditional leaders or community leaders. This mechanism for making complaints has included traditional authority as a way of moderating the role of social filter in protecting individual privacy and family integrity, yet achieving a balance with the need to maintain socio-cultural peace through local culture and ethics of the Indonesian nation as well as to create a situation where complaint mechanisms are used only as a last resort (the principle of ultimum remedium).
Co-Authors Anis Widyawati Falikha Ardiyani Zjubaidi Indah Sri Utari Joko Susanto Kaila Intan Fatihah Tiara Maharani