This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mu'tabar
Arif Budiman
UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Membaca Ulang Studi Hadis Di Barat: Analisis Shifting Paradigm Terhadap Evolusi Kritik Orientalis Arif Budiman
Al-Mu'tabar Vol. 5 No. 01 (2025): Al-Mu'tabar
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874//almutabar.2025.v5i1/2443/5

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the paradigm shift in Western hadith studies using Thomas Kuhn’s theoretical framework of shifting paradigm. The study focuses on tracing the epistemological evolution from the paradigm of orientalist skepticism toward a more critical-constructive approach that demonstrates openness to the authenticity of hadith. This research adopts a qualitative method through a library-based study. Data were collected from primary sources, including the works of Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, G.H.A. Juynboll, and Harald Motzki. A historical-comparative analysis was employed to examine the methodological transitions across different periods. The findings reveal a significant shift in how Western scholars conceptualize hadith authenticity—from an a priori rejection to a more contextual and multidisciplinary academic engagement. Furthermore, within Western scholarship, hadith studies have expanded into a broader epistemological discourse. In this regard, hadith is no longer viewed solely as a site of methodological contention but also as a dialogical space between Western critical inquiry and the Islamic intellectual tradition, contributing to the development of a more inclusive and dynamic contemporary hadith scholarship.
Membaca Ulang Studi Hadis Di Barat: Analisis Shifting Paradigm Terhadap Evolusi Kritik Orientalis Arif Budiman
Al-Mu'tabar Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Al-Mu'tabar
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874//almutabar.2025.v5i1/2443/5

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the paradigm shift in Western hadith studies using Thomas Kuhn’s theoretical framework of shifting paradigm. The study focuses on tracing the epistemological evolution from the paradigm of orientalist skepticism toward a more critical-constructive approach that demonstrates openness to the authenticity of hadith. This research adopts a qualitative method through a library-based study. Data were collected from primary sources, including the works of Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, G.H.A. Juynboll, and Harald Motzki. A historical-comparative analysis was employed to examine the methodological transitions across different periods. The findings reveal a significant shift in how Western scholars conceptualize hadith authenticity—from an a priori rejection to a more contextual and multidisciplinary academic engagement. Furthermore, within Western scholarship, hadith studies have expanded into a broader epistemological discourse. In this regard, hadith is no longer viewed solely as a site of methodological contention but also as a dialogical space between Western critical inquiry and the Islamic intellectual tradition, contributing to the development of a more inclusive and dynamic contemporary hadith scholarship.
Beyond Riwayah-Dirayah : The Penta-Structural Hadith Studies As Edi Safris Epistemological Contribution Qurrota A'yun; Arif Budiman; Sri Handayana
Al-Mu'tabar Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Al-Mutabar
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874//almutabar.2026.v6i1/3157/5

Abstract

  This article aims to analyse and reconstruct the epistemological ideas of Edi Safri, Professor of Hadith Studies at UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, which are formulated as the pentastructural study of hadith. Hadith studies in Indonesia and the Islamic world in general still rely on two major classifications: the science of hadith transmission (riwayah), which governs the transmission and preservation of hadith, and the science of hadith understanding (dirayah), which establishes the principles of sanad and matan criticism. Although both have made fundamental contributions to the Islamic scholarly tradition, this dualistic framework is not sufficient to depict the true breadth, depth, and contemporary relevance of hadith studies. There is a significant gap in the form of a void in the framework that integrates the dimensions of authenticity, historicity, hermeneutics, intellectual biography, and contemporary responses into a cohesive epistemological structure. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach and a biographical-intellectual study based on the author's direct involvement in the learning process with Edi Safri from the undergraduate to doctoral level (2012–present). The findings show that the pentastructural framework fills the epistemological gap left by classical classifications, integrating historical, hermeneutic, intellectual biography, and contemporary response dimensions into a coherent and pedagogically layered scientific architecture. The penta-structural framework of hadith studies includes: (1) al-bahṡ al-asāsī (main study/critique of chain-text), (2) al-bahṡ at-tārīkhī (historical study), (3) al-bahṡ ʻan al-fiqh al-ḥadīṡ (methodological study of hadith understanding), (4) al-bahṡ ʻan al-aʻlām wa al-muṣannafāt (study of figures and literature), and (5) al-bahṡ ʻan al-musykilāt wa al-ḥawādiṡ al-ḥadīṡiyyah (study of contemporary issues). This framework is relevant as an alternative methodology that is more holistic and systematic for the study of modern hadith in Indonesia and globally.