Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita
Moh Zeinudin
Universitas Wiraraja
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Tentang Legalitas Perkawinan dan Pencatatan Bagi Umat Beda Agama Di Indonesia Eko Purwanto; Herowati Poesoko; Moh Zeinudin
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5544

Abstract

Regulations regarding interfaith marriage and registration in Indonesia have developed dynamically over time. It was found that there were court decisions rejecting interfaith marriages and their registration, but it was also found that there were court decisions granting permission. This is considered to cause legal uncertainty, because inter-religious marriages still continue to occur, while Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and its amendments do not yet strictly and clearly regulate inter-religious marriages. This research focuses on examining the meaning of interfaith marriage and its registration over time in Indonesia as well as the direction of legal reconstruction in the future. This research is normative legal research that uses a statutory approach, a historical approach and a case approach. The legal hermeneutics research method is used to analyze the collected legal material. The research results found that the meaning of interfaith marriage and its registration experienced dynamics in its historical development in Indonesia from time to time, giving rise to legal uncertainty. Interfaith marriages and their registration can be given legal certainty by using a Court Decision or carried out abroad (in a country that permits interfaith marriages) and then reporting the registration administratively to the Civil Registry Office or Dukcapil Office to obtain legal certainty based on the provisions of the Marriage Law, Regulations Government Number 9 of 1975 concerning Implementation of UUP, and Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration, as amended by Law Number 24 of 2013
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Perbuatan Kampanye Hitam (Black Campaign) dalam Pemilu Melalui Media Sosial Abd Karim; Moh Zeinudin; Slamet Suhartono
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5676

Abstract

This article examines black campaigning on social media during the general election and its legal liability. Using legislative and conceptual approaches, normative legal research is done. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are used. Legal materials are analysed descriptive-qualitatively. Black political campaigns routinely abuse social media to attain their goals. The Law on General Elections and the General Election Commission Regulation on General Election Campaigns in Indonesia govern social media use in campaigns to combat this. The Law on General Elections and the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions penalise social media black campaigning with fines and jail time. Such actions are election crimes and cybercrimes since they involve technology
Penyelesaian Perkara Investasi Online Ilegal Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Beta Nur Insani; Moh Zeinudin; Miftahul Munir
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.5989

Abstract

This study analyzes Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection related to dispute resolution methods and responsibilities that can be carried out by illegal online investment business actors. This normative research was conducted using a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a historical/historical approach. Settlement of illegal online investment disputes can be carried out using consumer protection mechanisms as regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999. In this case, investors are positioned as consumers who have the right to security and clarity of information. Victims can take criminal legal action by reporting to the police, or through non-litigation channels such as mediation at BPSK. However, settlement is often hampered because the perpetrators use fake identities and do not have official permission from the OJK. Therefore, synergy between consumer protection, criminal law enforcement, and supervision of financial institutions is very important to ensure justice for victims of illegal investment. The perpetrator's responsibility can be imposed through: Civil: replacing losses based on Article 1365 of the Criminal Code, Criminal: charged with fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) and the ITE Law, Restitutive: returning the victim's assets through confiscation and auction mechanisms according to the TPPU Law
Co-Authors Abd Karim Beta Nur Insani Eko Purwanto Herowati Poesoko Miftahul Munir Slamet Suhartono