Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Enhanced Sustainability Assessment Framework for Plywood Manufacturing: A Multi-Method Approach Using Delphi Technique, BWM, and S-VSM Annisa Kesy Garside; Tyas Yuli Rosiani; Adelya Amanda; Thomy Eko Saputro; Eduardo e Oliveira
Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Published in January 2025 (published late, please read our note)
Publisher : The Industrial Engineering Department of Engineering Faculty at Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.955 KB) | DOI: 10.25077/josi.v23.n2.p188-206.2024

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing has emerged as a critical priority in addressing the complex environmental, social, and economic challenges of modern industry. This study focuses on the plywood sector, a significant contributor to manufacturing, which faces distinct sustainability issues such as high energy consumption, material inefficiencies, and hazardous working conditions. To address these challenges, the research introduces workload and noise level as critical indicators for assessing sustainability, broadening the scope of traditional evaluation methods. A multi-method framework was employed, integrating the Delphi technique to identify key sustainability indicators, the Best Worst Method (BWM) to assign weights to these indicators, and Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (S-VSM) paired with a Traffic Light System (TLS) to evaluate and visualize the Manufacturing Sustainability Score (MSS). Applied to a plywood manufacturing case study, the framework highlighted areas requiring improvement, particularly in worker well-being and operational safety, while demonstrating the industry's moderate overall efficiency. By offering actionable insights for improving resource use, operational processes, and employee conditions, this framework provides a practical tool for industry managers aiming to enhance sustainability. Furthermore, its adaptability makes it a valuable reference for other manufacturing sectors seeking to implement resource-efficient and sustainable practices. This research not only fills critical gaps in sustainability assessment but also contributes to advancing industry practices by emphasizing holistic and innovative approaches to manufacturing efficiency.
An Integrated Framework for Ergonomic Performance Assessment in Food Manufacturing: A Case Study Using Ergo-VSM, AHP, and TLS Tyas Yuli Rosiani; Meng-Hua Li; Dewi Rahmasari
Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Published in June 2025
Publisher : The Industrial Engineering Department of Engineering Faculty at Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.158 KB) | DOI: 10.25077/josi.v24.n1.p84-101.2025

Abstract

In food processing industries, particularly nut-based production that relies heavily on manual labor, ergonomic challenges related to repetitive motion, prolonged static postures, and thermal stress are increasingly prominent due to rising production demands. These issues are often concentrated at specific workstations and tend to be overlooked in conventional performance evaluations. To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated Ergonomic Performance Assessment (EPA) framework designed to evaluate ergonomic performance comprehensively across the entire production line. The framework integrates Ergonomic Value Stream Mapping (Ergo-VSM) for process visualization, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for assigning weights to ergonomic criteria, and the Traffic Light System (TLS) for intuitive performance classification. A case study was conducted in a peanut processing facility, involving 8 workstations. Data were gathered through direct observations, detailed task analyses, and expert input from three experts via Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Ergonomic indicators were derived from literature and expert consensus, weighted using AHP based on pairwise comparisons, and assessed using structured observational metrics. The results were visualized within the Ergo-VSM framework using TLS. Ergonomic performance was quantified through the Manufacturing Ergonomic Score (MES), which reached 69.15%. Based on a three-tier classification system low (<60%), moderate (60–90%), and high (>90%) this score falls within the moderate category, indicating several areas require improvement. Musculoskeletal disorder risks and high working temperatures were identified as the most critical concerns, particularly at thermally intensive and physically demanding workstations. The EPA framework enabled the visualization of ergonomic variation between workstations, allowing for systematic identification of priority areas for improvement. This research contributes to ergonomic evaluation literature by offering a structured, data-driven approach and provides practical insights for enhancing worker well-being and operational productivity.