Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Novum : Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Sport Law
Denial Ikram
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Norm Conflict Between Law Number 11 of 2022 Concerning Sports and the Regulation of the Minister of Youth and Sports Number 14 of 2024 Concerning Management Standards for Sports Organizations within the Scope of Achievement Sports Denial Ikram; I Made Sri Undy Mahardika; Heppy Hyma Puspytasar
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijsl.v2i01.40810

Abstract

This research analyzes the norm conflict between Law Number 11 of 2022 concerning Sports (Law 11/2022) and the Regulation of the Minister of Youth and Sports Number 14 of 2024 concerning Management Standards for Sports Organizations within the Scope of Achievement Sports (Permenpora No. 14 of 2024). The main objective is to identify potential normative contradictions and their implications for the autonomy and governance of achievement sports organizations in Indonesia. The analysis finds that a number of provisions in Permenpora No. 14 of 2024, such as the requirement for ministerial recommendations/approvals for internal organizational processes (congresses, changes to statutes/bylaws, legal entity ratification, changes in management), the minister's authority to intervene in internal disputes and form transition teams, and the establishment of detailed management criteria, potentially conflict with the principle of independence for sports organizations mandated by Law 11/2022. By applying the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, it is concluded that the provisions of Permenpora No. 14 of 2024 that contradict Law 11/2022 are juridically null and void by law. This norm conflict has implications for the erosion of sports organizations' autonomy, the risk of excessive government intervention, legal uncertainty, and potential misalignment with international sports governance principles. It is recommended that Permenpora No. 14 of 2024 be comprehensively reviewed and revised to align with Law 11/2022, to ensure that management standards strengthen good governance without sacrificing the fundamental independence of sports organizations.
Legal Reform of Legal Profession Amidst the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia: The Perspective of Mesu Budi's Philosophy of Law Muh. Ali Masnun; Dicky Eko Prasetio; Denial Ikram; Puja Aqdamuyasyaro P
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 02 (2025): The Dialectics of Justice, Legal Certainty, and Expediency in Contemporary Le
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v12i02.72355

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the legal profession raises significant concerns about whether the extensive application of AI could potentially replace human roles in this field. This study aims to analyze the challenges and dynamics associated with the implementation of AI in the legal profession, and to compare AI regulations across Indonesia, Malaysia, and the European Union. This research is a normative legal study employing conceptual, case-based, and legislative approaches. The findings affirm that AI will not replace the role of humans in the legal profession. As an officium nobile, the legal profession inherently requires moral, humanitarian, and value-based considerations that can only be performed by humans. The presence of "mesu budi"—a concept reflecting comprehensive utilization of IQ, EQ, and SQ—underscores that these facets are uniquely human and cannot be substituted by AI. The comparative analysis of AI regulations between Indonesia, Malaysia, and the European Union reveals that Indonesia's regulatory framework is lagging and lacks specific provisions regarding the use of AI in the legal profession. This study recommends the establishment of dedicated regulations for AI, particularly concerning its application in legal professions and associated accountability measures.
Co-Authors Dicky Eko Prasetio Heppy Hyma Puspytasar I Made Sri Undy Mahardika Masnun, Muh Ali Puja Aqdamuyasyaro P