Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Promoting Autonomy Learner Among University Students Rani Santika; Syaadiah Arifin; Siti Zulaiha; Elchin Gashimov
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i3.7381

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is an essential skill for university students, empowering them to manage their academic endeavors through goal-setting, self-monitoring, and reflection. This study explores the implementation of SRL strategies to promote learner autonomy, focusing on the interplay of technology, culture, and education. Using qualitative methods, the research analyzed data from interviews, observations, and document analysis involving students and educators. Findings reveal that while students excel in goal-setting (75%), engagement in monitoring (60%) and reflection (25%) remains limited, inhibiting the full SRL cycle. Challenges such as unfamiliarity with SRL (60%), poor time management (50%), and inadequate feedback (40%) further hinder adoption. Educators emphasize SRL in feedback and goal-setting (80%) but struggle with embedding it comprehensively in curricula (50%). The study highlights technology's potential to scaffold SRL through tools that enhance feedback, progress tracking, and personalized learning. To foster learner autonomy, the research recommends structured training for students, professional development for educators, and curriculum realignment to address cultural and systemic barriers. These insights aim to advance inclusive, learner-centered environments in higher education
Judicial Independence and Political Influence in Modern Democracies Adinda Zahra Fathya; Rani Santika
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.60

Abstract

This research examines contemporary human rights violations and evaluates the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing these issues. Using a qualitative approach, it employs doctrinal legal analysis and case studies to assess the role of international courts, tribunals, and human rights organizations. Key legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute, are analyzed to understand their impact on prosecuting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Reports from the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional human rights bodies highlight enforcement challenges, such as political constraints, jurisdictional limitations, and state non-cooperation. Case studies on Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela illustrate both the successes and shortcomings of international legal interventions. Strengthening global accountability requires enhanced cooperation, judicial independence, and more effective sanction mechanisms. The study also explores judicial independence as a fundamental pillar of democracy, assessing the extent of political influence on judicial autonomy. Through content analysis of judicial reforms and constitutional changes in democratic nations, the research identifies key patterns of political interference, including judicial appointments, budgetary control, and legislative restrictions on judicial review. While judicial independence upholds constitutional integrity and civil liberties, political interference can erode democratic institutions. The study concludes that safeguarding judicial autonomy necessitates strong legal frameworks, institutional transparency, and active civil society participation. These findings contribute to legal and political discourse, offering policy recommendations to enhance judicial resilience and democratic governance.