Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Perspektif Global South Review
Ahmad Mujaddid Fachrurreza
Sriwijaya University
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BRICS AND G7 IN RESPONDING TO THE UKRAINE-RUSSIA CRISIS: G20 MULTILATERAL CRISIS? Ica Cahayani; Ahmad Mujaddid Fachrurreza; Agata Nina Puspita
Global South Review Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Global South Review
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.81003

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objective: This research discusses the differences in BRICS and G7 responses to the Ukraine-Russia conflict, where these two groups consist of countries with different political interests. Following the results of the G7 and BRICS Summits, both responded differently to the Ukraine-Russia crisis. Background Problem: Differences in response are proposed because the G20 has the vision to achieve the resolution of policy issues on problems that hinder world economic growth, one of which is the food crisis caused by the Uraina-Russia conflict. The selection of the G7 and BRICS's different responses is the right strategy to determine how much potential the G20 has. It is difficult to achieve its goal of providing solutions for the world economy thanks to the structure of its members, who have diverse interests and responses to the Ukraine-Russia crisis. Novelty: This study uses interest-based theory to analyze the differences in the responses of the G7 and BRICS. This theory seeks to explain the formation of the G20's international regime by dismantling aspects of the fundamental interests behind the cognitive states that decided to establish the international regime of the G20. Method: The method used in this research is the discourse analysis method in a case set because this study wants to see changes in discourse related to the multilateral G20. Findings/Results: The complexity of trading, namely the BRICS and G7, with different responses and interests in responding to the Ukrainian crisis, can encourage a multilateralism crisis in the G20. The research results prove that the complexity of reporting generates different interests, so the response to the Ukrainian-Russian crisis tends to differ. Conclusion: The G20 has not been able to overcome the different interests of its members in solving the problem of the world food crisis because the discussion of the world food crisis is linked to the discussion of Ukrainian-Russian security politics.
Navigating Conditional Funding: Policy Reforms and Transparency Challenges in Indonesia’s JETP Implementation Maudy Noor Fadhlia; Ahmad Mujaddid Fachrurreza; Zhillan Fahlevi
Jurnal Perspektif Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Perspektif
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jp.v10i1.450

Abstract

Indonesia, which possesses significant renewable energy potential, is at a critical stage in its energy transition. Through the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), the country has secured an international financing commitment of USD 20 billion. However, access to these funds depends on meeting several requirements related to policy reform, transparency, and clear implementation strategies. This study aims to examine the challenges faced by Indonesia in fulfilling these requirements and to analyze the relationship between global climate finance expectations and Indonesia’s domestic socio-economic and political dynamics. This research employs a qualitative case study approach based on document analysis of the JETP agreement, government policies, and reports from international organizations and civil society groups. The findings indicate that although Indonesia demonstrates strong commitment to energy transition, policy reforms frequently encounter resistance from existing regulatory frameworks and entrenched interests within the fossil fuel sector. In addition, limited transparency in project selection and weak inter-institutional coordination continue to constrain effective fund utilization. These findings suggest that the success of JETP implementation depends not only on financial absorption capacity but also on strengthened governance, regulatory consistency, and transparent implementation frameworks.
Co-Authors Agata Nina Puspita Ica Cahayani Maudy Noor Fadhlia Zhillan Fahlevi