Ibrahim Adeyemi Adewumi
University of Ilorin, Nigeria

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Eksplorasi Komprehensif Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia: Sejarah, Prinsip, dan Praktik Kontemporer Aulil Amri; Fariqan Malhusna; Maryam Thahira; Nissa Azra Nabila; Nabila Miswar; Saniah Amatillah; Ibrahim Adeyemi Adewumi
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.227

Abstract

This paper aims to comprehensively examine Islamic Family Law in Indonesia, focusing on its historical development, legal sources, and core components such as marriage, inheritance, divorce, wills, adoption, and gifts. The method used is a literature review of Islamic legal texts and national regulations, particularly the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and the Marriage Law. The results show that Islamic Family Law in Indonesia has significantly evolved, especially since the enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974 and the implementation of KHI through Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991. Nevertheless, challenges remain in terms of implementation, public understanding, and criticism of certain provisions perceived as gender- biased. Ongoing reform and contextualization are needed to ensure Islamic family law delivers more equitable justice in Indonesia’s pluralistic society.
Legal And Psychological Implications Of Divorce Refusal: A Case Study Of Decision No. 880/Pdt.G/2023/Pa. Tmg Based On Sema No. 1 Of 2022 Sarkanto Sarkanto; Ibrahim Adeyemi Adewumi; Benjamin Price
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v3i1.3

Abstract

This study analyses divorce denial's legal and psychological implications in case No. 880/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Tmg, based on the Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 1 of 2022. The denial was due to the unmet requirement of a six-month separation period, despite evidence of continuous conflict and the husband's criminal behavior. The research examines whether the court considered the psychological aspects of both parties and how SEMA No. 1 of 2022 was applied. Methods This research uses a qualitative approach with case studies that analyze legal documents and court decisions related to the application of SEMA No. 1 of 2022 in divorce rejection cases; the findings highlight the need for legal flexibility to accommodate emotional and cultural factors in divorce cases, suggesting possible policy revisions to support affected individuals better.