Muchamad Ikbal
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengembangan Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Haji Berbasis Pada Kepentingan Jamaah Muchamad Ikbal; Aden Rosadi; Usep Saepullah; Nuryamin Nuryamin; Nurul Hudayanti Mahas
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i2.173

Abstract

This research discusses the development of policies for the implementation of the hajj in Indonesia that is oriented towards the interests of pilgrims. As the country with the largest number of pilgrims in the world, Indonesia faces various challenges in providing efficient, accountable, and responsive services. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the Hajj implementation policy based on the regulatory framework, especially Law No. 8 of 2019, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of its implementation in fulfilling the rights of pilgrims. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method. The analysis was carried out on relevant policy documents, regulations, evaluative reports, and academic literature. The theoretical approach of public policy and excellent service is used as a basis for analysis in examining the dimensions of public services, the development of hajj officers, and fund governance by the Hajj Financial Management Agency (BPKH). The results of the study show that although there has been some progress in regulatory and institutional aspects, challenges such as complex bureaucracy, limited human resource capacity, and lack of transparency and public participation are still the main obstacles. However, there is potential for improvement through systemic reforms that emphasize management transparency, increased professionalism of officers, and the involvement of pilgrims in the evaluation process. In conclusion, the policy orientation that is in favor of the pilgrims not only ensures the safe and comfortable implementation of the hajj, but also reflects the state's commitment to fulfilling the constitutional rights of citizens. The strategic recommendations in this study are expected to be constructive input for policy makers in realizing more inclusive and sustainable Hajj governance.
Early Marriage in the Islamic Legal System, the Continental and Anglo Saxon European Legal Systems Muchamad Ikbal; Ah. Fathonih; Fauzan Ali Rasyid
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v2i2.292

Abstract

Child marriage is a violation of human rights that has a systemic impact on aspects of reproductive health, education, economy, and social participation. This article conducts a comparative-critical analysis of the construction of child marriage law in three dominant legal systems: Islamic Law (based on maslahah mursalah), Continental European Law (codification-based), and Anglo-Saxon Law (precedent-based), using the theoretical framework of legal pluralism Santos (1987) and the concept of best interest of the child (CRC 1989). The research method combines a normative-doctrinal approach with a critical discourse analysis of primary legal texts and court decisions in 15 representative countries. The findings reveal three paradigms: (1) Contemporary Islamic law has undergone a transformation from classical fiqh through the reinterpretation of maqashid shari'ah with an age limit of 18 years (Law No. 16/2019 in Indonesia and the Child's Rights Act 2003 in Nigeria); (2) The Continental European System implements legal paternalism through the harmonization of EU Directive 2019/51 with the minimum age standard of 18 years without dispensation; (3) The Anglo-Saxon system developed judicial activism through progressive precedents (the Re Marriage Act 2015 in the UK and Obergefell v. Hodges in the US). This study contributes to the theory of global legal convergence by recommending an integrated legal reform model that synthesizes the legal certainty of the European system, Anglo-Saxon flexibility, and Islamic maslahah values.