Sidabukke, Sahat Marulitua
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Hukum Gambar yang Dihasilkan oleh Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Objek Jual Beli dalam Akta Notaris Tania, Florencia Imanuelia; Sidabukke, Sahat Marulitua
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.965

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology opens new possibilities for images generated by AI to be used as objects in Notarial Sale and Purchase Deed. The images produced by AI are regarded as representations of human intellectual work due to the process of giving instructions and curation. Therefore, these images hold legal status as object of agreement in Notarial Sale and Purchase Deed, provided they comply with the applicable regulations in Indonesia.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas yang Dibuat Berdasarkan Dokumen Palsu Sidabukke, Sahat Marulitua; Josa, Meidia
Notary Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/nj.v5i1.9304

Abstract

In establishing an LLC, the notary oversees the establishment of the company starting from the preparation and drafting of the deed of establishment of the LLC, ratification of the deed of establishment by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, preparation of the company's articles of association, and checking documents. However, there have been cases in which the notary was negligent and did not apply the principle of caution in checking documents where the founder of the LLC authorized his assistant to provide fake documents before the notary to make the deed of establishment of the LLC. Furthermore, if a notary commits a violation and is found to have criminal elements, the Criminal Code regulates the punishment for the notary who violates the rules. The purpose of this research is to analyze the regulations regarding the accountability of notaries who establish LLC based on fake documents. The method used in this research is empirical normative method, using secondary data from various legal literature supported with results from interview. From the analysis carried out, it can be concluded that a notary who has proven to have committed an unlawful act can be subjected to Code of Ethics sanctions by the Honorary Council in the form of reprimand, warning of temporary dismissal from the organization, honorable dismissal from the organization, or dishonorable dismissal from the organization. Bahasa Indonesia Abstract: Dalam pendirian PT, notaris mengawal  pendirian  perseroan  mulai  dari  Penyusunan  dan  Pembuatan akta pendirian PT, Pengesahan akta pendirian oleh Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, Penyusunan anggaran dasar perusahaan, dan pengecekan dokumen. Namun ada kasus terjadi di mana notaris lalai dan tidak menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam melakukan pengecekan dokumen yang mana pendiri PT nya memberikan kuasa kepada asistennya untuk memberikan dokumen palsu di hadapan notaris untuk membuat akta pendirian PT. Lebih lanjut, jika notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran dan ditemui ada unsur-unsur pidananya maka KUHP yang mengatur hukuman untuk notaris yang melanggar aturan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan dalam pertanggungjawaban notaris yang melakukan pendirian PT berdasarkan dokumen palsu. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif empiris dengan menggunakan data sekunder dari berbagai literatur hukum yang didukung dengan hasil wawancara. Dari analisa yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa notaris yang terbukti melakukan suatu perbuatan melawan hukum dapat dikenakan sanksi Kode Etik oleh Dewan Kehormatan berupa teguran, peringatan pemberhentian sementara dari organisasi, pemberhentian dengan hormat dari organisasi, atau pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat dari organisasi.
DOUBLE PUNISHMENT IN THE WAITING TIME FOR DEATH PENALTY: A STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Sidabukke, Sahat Marulitua
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6634

Abstract

In Indonesia, until 2022 there were 428 people who have been sentenced with death penalty by anaesthetics and were still waiting for their execution to be carried out. Among those people, 101 have been sitting in the death row for more than 10 years. This means that those who are sentenced to death by the court (inkracht van gewijsde) were imprisoned for life until their execution. They had to carry out two kinds of punishments, videlicet death penalty and imprisonment. There is a lengthy waiting time, which results in the neglect of death row convicts' rights. This is a normative juridical research with data collected through literature study, court decision analysis, and concept test in focus group discussion attended by Supreme Prosecutor, Supreme Court, National Narcotics Agency, State Police of Republic of Indonesia and National Commission of Human Rights. The result of this research shows that such waiting period creates distrust between judicial institutions. It also creates uncertainty and becomes a loophole for death row inmates to apply for unlimited legal remedies which causes delay of the execution of the death penalty. On the other hand, the role of the Public Prosecutor as the executioner of death penalty is not yet optimal. Because of the two reasons above (legal remedies and political will), they worry about potentially being considered as violating human rights.