Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Upaya Preventif dalam Pendidikan Anti-Korupsi di Desa Kalinanas Kabupaten Boyolali Dwijaya, Rasta Nadila; Roosaputri, Emillia Puspitaningtyas; de Sousa, Freidelino P.R.A.
Magistrorum et Scholarium: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jms.v5i22024p172-181

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan ancaman terbesar bagi keberlangsungan hidup berbangsa dan bernegara saat ini. Korupsi dapat ditemukan baik di lembaga pemerintahan maupun swasta, serta melibatkan pimpinan lembaga yang sejatinya menjadi role model bagi generasi muda. Upaya untuk menekan angka tingginya korupsi ditempuh melalui aspek hukum, namun upaya preventif melalui aspek pendidikan belum banyak ditempuh. Pendidikan anti-korupsi merupakan upaya preventif untuk membangun kesadaran dan integritas diri terhadap perilaku koruptif. Pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini berfungsi menjadi penyuluhan kepada masyarakat mengenai pendidikan anti korupsi. Tidak hanya penyuluhan mengenai, pendidikan anti-korupsi saja, kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini juga memberikan penyuluhan mengenai sadar hukum dan bantuan hukum.
Regulating the Sea from the Shore: The Silent Clash between Indonesia’s Government Regulation No. 26 of 2023 and UNCLOS de Sousa, Freidelino P.R.A.
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i1.5170

Abstract

This article critically repositions the precautionary principle and due diligence obligations as foundational norms in the international law of the sea that should have been operationalized in Government Regulation No. 26 of 2023, enacted as an implementing instrument of Article 56 of Law No. 32 of 2014 on Maritime Affairs. It interrogates the regulation’s underlying that whether the Government Regulation No. 26 of 2023 can be normatively harmonized with UNCLOS to ensure compliance with the precautionary principle and due diligence obligations in regulating coastal and marine spaces? In light of the legal policy of it, which reflects a utilitarian–economic rationality that legitimizes marine sediment exploitation through administrative licensing, this study argues against this such approach, primarily such regulatory logic departs from the normative architecture of UNCLOS 1982, which embeds precaution and environmental stewardship as core constraints on the exercise of sovereign rights over maritime areas. The analysis demonstrates that Government Regulation No. 26 of 2023 represents a substantive normative shift, distancing Indonesia’s coastal governance framework from both its domestic maritime legislation and its international legal commitments. This article advances the argument that a structural realignment of the regulation’s substantive content is imperative to reintegrate precaution and due diligence as binding regulatory standards. Normative harmonization is thus essential to prevent systemic incoherence between national regulatory practice and the international law of the sea.