Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum
T. Riza. Zarzani
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Criminal Responsibility For Perpetrators Of Fraud By Means Of Hypnosis Agustian Fery Fernando Sitanggang; T. Riza. Zarzani
LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): LAWYER : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/lawyer.v1i2.447

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators of fraud by means of hypnosis. This research is a normative literature research as a legal material collection technique which is then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. As for the results of this study, taking other people's goods by means of hypnosis can be categorized as a criminal act of fraud because of the fulfillment of one of the elements of the offense of fraud, namely the element of deception, which is an act of action carried out in such a way that the act creates trust or confidence in the truth of something to another person where it can influence people to move other people to hand over something to him to be his goal in owning other people's goods. And if done consciously and there are consequences caused by the act. Next, the theory of criminal responsibility that is appropriate to be applied in this case is the doctrine of the essential elements of crime, namely actus reus (physical element) mens rea (mental element), namely the state of mind. The dualism school, on the other hand, states that only the actus reus is an element of an offense, while the mens rea includes the responsibility of the maker. The crime of fraud with hypnosis in its enforcement efforts still has many obstacles, including people who are victims who are reluctant to report, legal substance factors, law enforcement factors, supporting facilities and facilities for crime prevention. And the factor of public awareness of the law.
Implementation Of Coaching For Prisoners Who Abuse Narcotics As An Effort To Prevent Criminal Offenses (Case Study Of Class Ii Langkat Narcotics Correctional Institution) Rudi Prasetyo Panjaitan; T. Riza. Zarzani
LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): LAWYER : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/lawyer.v1i2.451

Abstract

Implementation of Coaching of Narcotics Abuse Convicts as an Effort to Prevent Repetition of Crimes (Case Study of Class II Langkat Narcotics Correctional Institution. This study aims to determine the implementation of coaching conducted by the Class II Langkat Narcotics Correctional Institution against narcotics abuse inmates as an effort to prevent repetition of criminal acts and to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of inmate coaching at the Class II Langkat Narcotics Correctional Institution. This research was conducted at the Class II Langkat Narcotics Penitentiary. The data obtained then processed and analyzed descriptively qualitative that is where the data is collected, compiled, interpreted, and analyzed so as to provide a complete description in accordance with the problem at hand. The results showed that (1) Implementation of Coaching in Correctional Institution Narcotics Class II Langkat implemented in several stages including the initial stage, the advanced stage and the final stage. In the early stages include personality development and independence, in the advanced stage there is an assimilation stage where the inmate is entitled to leave before release or parole. at this stage also implemented social work assimilation which aims that if the inmate later has been released then he is not ostracized by the community and does not repeat the crime again. This final stage of coaching will be given parole for prisoners who have met the requirements. (2) The implementation of inmate coaching at the Class II Langkat Narcotics Penitentiary has been going well but has not been able to run effectively. This is because the implementation of coaching is not classified based on the crime, which means that the coaching carried out on narcotics and non-narcotics prisoners is equalized.
The implementation of Coaching for Prisoners of Drug Abuse Narcotics as a Preventive Effort Narcotics Crime (Case Study of Class II Langkat Narcotics Correctional Institution) Rudi Prasetyo Panjaitan; T. Riza. Zarzani
LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): LAWYER : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/lawyer.v1i2.463

Abstract

Guidance is provided to drug inmates in an attempt to prevent recidivism (case study at Langkat Type 2 Drug Correctional Facility). The purpose of this study was to examine the implementation status of the guidance provided by Class II Langkat Narcotics Correctional Facility to drug-abusing inmates to prevent relapse to criminal behavior, and the implementation of inmate guidance at Langkat Narcotics Correctional Facility. It is to judge the effectiveness of Class II is to be determined. The test was conducted at Class II Langkat Narcotics Prison. The data obtained were processed and analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This involves collecting, compiling, interpreting, and analyzing data to provide a complete explanation according to the problem at hand. The results showed that (1) the implementation of class II run cut narcotic instruction in correctional facilities is carried out at several stages, including the initial stage, advanced stage, and terminal stage; In the early stages include personality development and independence, in the advanced stage there is an assimilation stage where the inmate is entitled to leave before release or parole. at this stage also implemented social work assimilation which aims that if the inmate later has been released then he is not ostracized by the community and does not repeat the crime again. This final stage of coaching will be given parole for prisoners who have met the requirements. (2) The implementation of inmate coaching at the Class II Langkat Narcotics Penitentiary has been going well but has not been able to run effectively. This is because the implementation of coaching is not classified based on the crime, which means that the coaching carried out on narcotics and non-narcotics prisoners is equalized.
Co-Authors Agustian Fery Fernando Sitanggang Rudi Prasetyo Panjaitan