Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal) International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia
Ruhana, Siti
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING (PjBL) DALAM MENGATASI KESULITAN KONSENTRASI BELAJAR ANAK USIA 5-6 TAHUN DI PAUD KB AN-NUR Suhirman, Suhirman; Ramdhani, Zuhut; Ruhana, Siti; Najamuddin, Najamuddin
Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal) Vol 4 No 3 (2024): DE_Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Univesitas Dharmas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56667/dejournal.v4i3.1143

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pendektan PjBL dalam mengatasi kesulitan konsentrasi belajar anak usia 5-6 tahun. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode eksperimen dengan jenis penelitian pre experimental design. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di PAUD KB An-Nur dengan subjek penelitian kelompok B sejumlah 10 anak. Peneliti memperoleh data dari hasil observasi dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah uji validitas, normalitas, dan hipotesis. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data berupa lembar observasi dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hasil validasi menggunakan expert judgement memperoleh skor 30, dengan rentang nilai 27,18 < X ≤ 33,54 dan dengan kategori “baik Hasil uji normalitas data pada penelitian ini berdistribusi normal dengan nilai pre test chi kuadrat hitung = 8,2, selanjutnya ini dibandingkan dengan chi kuadrat tabel =11,070 pada taraf signifikan 5%, maka dapat dinyatakan bahwa chi kuadrat hitung lebih kecil dari chi kuadrat tabel (8,2<18,307), sehingga data ini dinyatakan berdistribusi “ Normal”. Hasil hipotesis dengan harga t hitung = 27,5 Harga t tersebut selanjutnya dibandingkan dengan harga t tabel dengan dk=n-1= 10-1. Dengan dk=9, dan bila taraf kesalahan ditetapkan 5%, maka t tabel=2,262, jadi t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel (27,5>2,262), sehingga Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Indonesia vs. Malaysia: The Battle for Border Territory Resolved Ruhana, Siti; Karim, Tun Abdul
International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Regional Cooperation and Legal Frameworks: Combating Corruption, Pollution, and
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ildisea.v3i1.35111

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the resolution of the longstanding border dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia. The study delves into the complex dynamics of this conflict, offering insights into its historical context, the key issues at stake, and the eventual resolution reached between the two nations. The Indonesia-Malaysia border dispute has been a contentious issue for decades, marked by conflicting territorial claims and occasional tensions between the two neighboring countries. Rooted in historical and geopolitical factors, the dispute has encompassed various regions along the land border, including areas rich in natural resources and strategic importance. This paper examines the factors that fueled the dispute, ranging from historical grievances to economic interests and geopolitical considerations. It explores how these factors influenced the negotiation process and shaped the positions of both Indonesia and Malaysia. Central to the analysis is the discussion of the diplomatic efforts and mechanisms employed to address the dispute. From bilateral negotiations to third-party mediation, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of different approaches in facilitating dialogue and fostering cooperation between the two nations. Furthermore, the paper highlights the role of international law and norms in guiding the resolution process. It assesses how principles of territorial sovereignty, boundary delimitation, and peaceful dispute resolution were applied in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement. Finally, the study discusses the outcome of the resolution and its implications for Indonesia, Malaysia, and the broader region. It examines the terms of the agreement, including any concessions made by either party, and considers the potential impact on bilateral relations, economic development, and regional stability. By providing a nuanced analysis of the Indonesia-Malaysia border dispute and its resolution, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of interstate conflicts and the mechanisms available for their peaceful resolution in Southeast Asia.
Indonesia vs. Malaysia: The Battle for Border Territory Resolved Ruhana, Siti; Karim, Tun Abdul
International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Vol 3 No 1 (2024): January-June, 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ildisea.v3i1.78889

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the resolution of the longstanding border dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia. The study delves into the complex dynamics of this conflict, offering insights into its historical context, the key issues at stake, and the eventual resolution reached between the two nations. The Indonesia-Malaysia border dispute has been a contentious issue for decades, marked by conflicting territorial claims and occasional tensions between the two neighboring countries. Rooted in historical and geopolitical factors, the dispute has encompassed various regions along the land border, including areas rich in natural resources and strategic importance. This paper examines the factors that fueled the dispute, ranging from historical grievances to economic interests and geopolitical considerations. It explores how these factors influenced the negotiation process and shaped the positions of both Indonesia and Malaysia. Central to the analysis is the discussion of the diplomatic efforts and mechanisms employed to address the dispute. From bilateral negotiations to third-party mediation, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of different approaches in facilitating dialogue and fostering cooperation between the two nations. Furthermore, the paper highlights the role of international law and norms in guiding the resolution process. It assesses how principles of territorial sovereignty, boundary delimitation, and peaceful dispute resolution were applied in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement. Finally, the study discusses the outcome of the resolution and its implications for Indonesia, Malaysia, and the broader region. It examines the terms of the agreement, including any concessions made by either party, and considers the potential impact on bilateral relations, economic development, and regional stability. By providing a nuanced analysis of the Indonesia-Malaysia border dispute and its resolution, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of interstate conflicts and the mechanisms available for their peaceful resolution in Southeast Asia.
Co-Authors Karim, Tun Abdul Najamuddin Najamuddin, Najamuddin Ramdhani, Zuhut SUHIRMAN SUHIRMAN