Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education
ZA, Asep Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Integrating Assessment Tools and Practices in EFL Classrooms: A Multidimensional Approach Aligned with CEFR Standards ZA, Asep Ahmad; Ratmo
IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education
Publisher : Master Program in Indonesian Language Education and The Institute for Research and Community Service STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/ijlhe.v8i1.1823

Abstract

This study critically examines the evolving role of assessment and evaluation in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL), emphasizing a paradigm shift from summative judgment to a continuous, formative process integral to instruction. Through qualitative content analysis of theoretical literature and practical frameworks, the research synthesizes multidimensional assessment practices that align with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It explores diverse assessment tools—including written exams, oral tests, multiple-choice questions, performance tasks, checklists, and analytic rubrics—and evaluates their efficacy in measuring integrated language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing). Findings reveal that imbalances in skill development often stem from isolated assessment methods, leading to communicative inadequacies (e.g., comprehension without production). The study advocates for contextually authentic, CEFR-aligned strategies that bridge receptive and productive competencies, such as combining reading with written responses or listening with oral tasks. Additionally, it underscores the distinction between assessment (systematic observation) and evaluation (criterion-referenced judgment), highlighting the need for balanced tool selection to enhance reliability and reduce anxiety. Practical implications include leveraging checklists for skill-specific benchmarks, analytic rubrics for performance clarity, and iterative feedback for writing development. The research concludes that holistic, integrated assessment designs are essential for fostering balanced language proficiency and achieving meaningful educational outcomes in global EFL contexts.
Integrating Assessment Tools and Practices in EFL Classrooms: A Multidimensional Approach Aligned with CEFR Standards ZA, Asep Ahmad; Ratmo
IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education
Publisher : Master Program in Indonesian Language Education and The Institute for Research and Community Service STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/ijlhe.v8i1.1823

Abstract

This study critically examines the evolving role of assessment and evaluation in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL), emphasizing a paradigm shift from summative judgment to a continuous, formative process integral to instruction. Through qualitative content analysis of theoretical literature and practical frameworks, the research synthesizes multidimensional assessment practices that align with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It explores diverse assessment tools—including written exams, oral tests, multiple-choice questions, performance tasks, checklists, and analytic rubrics—and evaluates their efficacy in measuring integrated language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing). Findings reveal that imbalances in skill development often stem from isolated assessment methods, leading to communicative inadequacies (e.g., comprehension without production). The study advocates for contextually authentic, CEFR-aligned strategies that bridge receptive and productive competencies, such as combining reading with written responses or listening with oral tasks. Additionally, it underscores the distinction between assessment (systematic observation) and evaluation (criterion-referenced judgment), highlighting the need for balanced tool selection to enhance reliability and reduce anxiety. Practical implications include leveraging checklists for skill-specific benchmarks, analytic rubrics for performance clarity, and iterative feedback for writing development. The research concludes that holistic, integrated assessment designs are essential for fostering balanced language proficiency and achieving meaningful educational outcomes in global EFL contexts.
Co-Authors Ratmo