Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Produk UMKM Yang Tidak Bersertifikat SNI dan BPOM Yuliana Indah Sari; M. Rizki Azmi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11064

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze consumer protection for Pineapple Chips UMKM that do not register SNI and BPOM, and to find out the process of determining SNI and BPOM certification for Pineapple Chips UMKM products that can provide legal certainty for business actors. Consumers have the right to comfort, security, and safety in consuming goods and/or services, products that must register SNI and BPOM to ensure consumer safety and security. The urgency of this research for consumers is the importance of choosing certified products. As well as for business actors to realize legal awareness in registering their products, in order to create legal protection, and as an evaluation of the government to provide counseling and guidance to MSMEs in registering their product certification. The research method used is sociological research with a statutory regulatory approach. The novelty of this research lies in the importance of legal protection for consumers by registering SNI and BPOM, as well as the determination or process of SNI and BPOM that should be carried out by the pineapple chips UMKM to create legal certainty. The results of the study showed that there are two forms of legal protection for consumers, namely preventive protection by conducting supervision once a year at the factory where the product is made, before it is distributed. BPOM carries out licensing by testing product content, product specifications, and processed materials used before being distributed. As well as repressive legal protection through litigation and non-litigation, if there is an unlawful act or a criminal act.   Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis perlindungan konsumen terhadap UMKM Keripik Nenas yang tidak mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM, dan proses penetapan sertifikasi SNI dan BPOM pada produk UMKM Keripik Nenas yang dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha. Konsumen berhak mendapatkan hak atas kenyamanan, keamanan, dan keselamatan dalam mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa, hal ini dibuktikkan dengan produk harus mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM untuk menjamin keamanan, keselamatan konsumen. Urgensi penelitian ini bagi konsumen pentingnya dalam memilih produk yang telah tersertivikasi. Serta bagi pelaku usaha untuk mewujudkan kesadaran hukum dalam mendaftarkan produknya, demi terciptanya perlindungan hukum, serta sebagai evaluasi kepada pemerintah untuk memberikan penyuluhan, dan pembinaan kepada UMKM dalam mendaftarkan sertifikasi produknya. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian sosiologis dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada pentingnya perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dengan mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM, serta penetapan atau proses SNI dan BPOM yang seharusnya dilakukan UMKM Keripik Nenas untuk menciptakan kepastian hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada dua bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen, yakni perlindungan preventif dengan melakukan pengawasan satu kali setahun di pabrik tempat pembuatan produk, sebelum diedarkan. BPOM melakukan perizinan dengan menguji kandungan produk, spesifikasi produk, bahan olahan yang digunakan sebelum diedarkan. Serta perlindungan hukum represif melalui litigasi dan non litigasi jika terjadi perbuatan melawan hukum, ataupun tindak pidana.
Legal Protection of Trade Secrets in Culinary Business Agreements for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises M Rizqi Azmi; Dibah, Nabilah Farah; Yuliana Indah Sari
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v19i1.3758

Abstract

All companies have confidential information that is not allowedto be seen by the general public or even known by their employees. In this case, the Indonesian government has enacted laws to protect trade secrets, as local products in Indonesia have high economic value. This article examines the legal protection of trade secrets in culinary business agreementsfor Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). And analyzethe challenges faced byMSMEsinthe culinary sectorin implementinglegal protectionoftrade secrets through business agreements. Also, analyzing the implementation of Law No. 30 of 2003 on trade secrets in protecting against violations of trade secrets. The method used in this research is the normativejuridical method by conducting a literature review related to thediscussed issues. The research results show that although the law provides legal protection for trade secrets, in reality, thereare still many information leaks that occur after an employeeleaves the company and joins a competitor. Therefore, it is considered important for business actors to receive legal protection to ensure the implementation of the intellectual property rights system as expected.
Pelanggaran Hak Merek Yang Telah Terdaftar Berdasarkan Putusan Hakim Nomor 89/PDT.SUS-Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST Yuliana Indah Sari; Nabilah Farah Dibah; Felly Faradina
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Juli: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i4.1797

Abstract

A trademark serves as a distinctive sign identifying the origin of goods or services and is protected under the first-to-file principle, whereby exclusive rights are granted to the first applicant who registers the mark through the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). However, disputes may arise when similar trademarks are granted registration despite prior registration by another party. This study aims to analyze the judges' legal considerations in Decision Number 89/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst concerning trademark infringement and to examine the legal responsibilities of the defendants. The research employed a normative legal method through the analysis of statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that the court concluded the defendant had acted in bad faith and declared the cancellation of the defendant's trademark registration along with all its legal consequences. Furthermore, the defendants were held responsible for complying with the court's decision and bearing the litigation costs. This study emphasizes the importance of legal certainty and the consistent application of the first-to-file principle to ensure effective protection of registered trademark rights in Indonesia.