Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Gulianti, Lia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Surat Tanda Bukti Akta Keterangan Waris Sebagai Asas Kepastian Hukum Gulianti, Lia
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11338

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of Permen ATR / BPN Number 16 of 2021 concerning the third amendment to Land Registration in Article 111 paragraph (1) letter C concerning the making of a certificate of evidence of the Deed of Inheritance and Article 111 paragraph (5) the transfer of rights falls to 1 (one) person who receives the inheritance based on the Deed of Inheritance, which deed raises inconsistencies in legal norms related to Article 111 paragraph (1). This research focuses on normative juridical law as formulated by legislation. The inheritance certificate is made before a notary for all groups and the inheritance deed is made the same as the Deed of Distribution of Inheritance Rights which has a different form and content, The fact in the field is that there are many Notaries who cannot distinguish the making of the deed which results in a discrepancy between the evidence letter of the Deed of Inheritance and the Deed of Distribution of Inheritance, the deed is recorded at the Land Agency Office in various regions such as Bandung City, Bandung Regency and West Bandung, resulting in legal uncertainty and resulting in confusion or obscuration of rules and having an impact on heirs and sole recipients or recipients of inheritance rights that can be cancelled. As there is an abolition of groups but cannot be abolished, the pluralism inheritance law, so it is necessary to have regulations governing the Deed of Inheritance Certificate and Deed of Division of Inheritance Rights due to different functions. As with legislation, there is a legal principle that regulations that have a lower level in the hierarchy of regulations do not differ from each other.   Penelitian ini yang bertujuan mengkaji mengenai pengaruh Permen ATR/BPN Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang perubahan ketiga Pendaftaran Tanah pada Pasal 111 ayat (1) huruf C tentang pembuatan surat tanda bukti akta keterangan waris dan Pasal 111 ayat (5) peralihan haknya jatuh kepada 1 (satu) orang penerima warisan berdasarkan Akta Waris, akta mana menimbulkan inkonsistensi norma hukum terkait pasal 111 ayat (1). Penelitian ini fokus pada hukum yuridis normatif sebagaimana dirumuskan oleh perundang-undang (law in books). Keterangan waris dibuat dihadapan Notaris untuk semua golongan dan akta waris dibuat sama seharusnya akta pembagian hak waris yang substansi bentuk dan isi yang berbeda, dan tidak membedakan golongan yang diatur dalam KUHPerdata, fakta dilapangan banyak sekali Notaris tidak dapat membedakan pembuatan akta tersebut dan membuat untuk semua warga Negara Indonesia asli  yang mengakibatkan ketidaksesuaian antara surat tanda bukti akta keterangan waris dan akta pembagian waris, yang mana akta tersebut telah di catat pada Kantor Badan Pertanahan diberbagai wilayah seperti Kota Bandung, Kabupaten Bandung dan Bandung Barat, sehingga terdapat ketidakpastian hukum dan mengakibatkan konprontasi atau pengaburan aturan serta berdampak terhadap ahli waris dan penerima tunggal atau penerima hak waris yang dapat dibatalkan. Sebagaimana adanya penghapusan golongan namun tidak dapat dihapuskan hukum waris yang pluralisme sehingga perlu adanya peraturan yang mengatur atas akta keterangan waris dan akta pembagian hak waris dikarenakan fungsi yang berbeda. Sebagaimana perundang-undangan adanya asas hukum peraturan yang memiliki tingkat rendah secara hirarki peraturan tidak berbenturan lebih tinggi.
Implications of Digital Transformation of Land Registration Processes as Seen in The Face of Agrarian Law Gulianti, Lia; Kurniati, Nia; Nurhayati, Elis
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.48945

Abstract

Digital transformation in the Land Registration Process is part of the modernization of land administration and services in Indonesia. The digitalization of the land registration process is regulated by Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN No. 3 of 2023 concerning the Issuance of Electronic Documents. The land registration activity refers to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021. The legal umbrella for the digitalization of land registration is regulated in the UUITE, UUSPK, PP PSTP, PBBSSN, and Presidential Decree SPBE. Digital transformation involves electronic land registration, making the shift to the UUPA a specialist lesson from the perspective of legal certainty and legal protection. There are crucial issues regarding the electronic system, the legality and evidentiary power of electronic certificates, especially in the event of a dispute or system failure. Meanwhile, the electronic system also affects legal protection faced with data security risks, the potential for digital maladministration, resulting in losses arising from system errors. The implications of digital transformation in the land registration process in the UUPA and PP are required to evaluate the extent to which the implementation of electronic systems is able to guarantee Legal Certainty which must be clear, consistent and predictable as well as Legal Protection (guarantee provided by the legal system to protect every right to land ownership for the community, as well as identifying the problem of disharmony or overlapping rules as a logical consequence of legal implications and digital implications. This qualitative research applies a juridical-normative approach and is enriched with in-depth interview data. Of course, the most fundamental implication is the emergence of disharmony of rules between lex specialis, namely the UUPA with Lex Generalis UU ITE and technical regulations that support digitalization, and overlapping regulations related to the protection of ownership rights and the validity of electronic evidence (for example between BPN government regulations and the ITE Law). This condition hinders the realization of the goals of Indonesia's Transformation Infrastructure in the land sector. This research recommends comprehensive harmonization of regulations, the establishment of clear legal responsibilities in the digitalization of the land registration process.
Co-Authors Nia Kurniati Nurhayati, Elis