Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Greenwashing as Environmental Fraud: Highlighting the Lack of Regulation and Law Enforcement in Indonesia Lebie, Romansyah Fitra; Br. Sihombing, Rio Riccha
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 7 No. 2 JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31612

Abstract

Greenwashing is a practice that is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, along with increasing consumer awareness of environmental sustainability. This phenomenon occurs when companies claim that their products are environmentally friendly, but the claims are not supported by legitimate evidence or are merely a marketing strategy. This article aims to explore the greenwashing phenomenon in Indonesia, identify its impact on consumers and the environment, and analyze the lack of regulation and law enforcement governing sustainability claims. Based on descriptive qualitative research, it was found that greenwashing harms consumers financially and undermines their trust in legitimate sustainability claims. In addition, greenwashing also hinders progress in environmental protection efforts by diverting attention from more effective solutions and reducing the competitiveness of truly green products. The lack of clear regulations and adequate oversight by relevant agencies in Indonesia exacerbates this problem. Therefore, strengthening more specific regulations and stricter law enforcement are urgently needed to create a more transparent market and support true sustainability. This article recommends improved regulations, increased capacity of oversight agencies, and more severe sanctions to address greenwashing practices and support broader environmental protection
From love to wound: Domestic violence and the forfeiture of parental rights Lebie, Romansyah Fitra; Kasim, Nur Mohamad; Bakun, Dolot Alhasni
Journal of Gender Equality Disability Social Inclusion and Children Vol. 3 No. 2: (January) 2026
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/jgedsic.v3i2.2026.2316

Abstract

Background: This paper aims to investigate the juridical foundation and the ethical reasoning behind the termination of parental rights due to domestic violence, using the best interest of the child as its compass, and mapping the disparity between legal norms and judicial practice. The method employed is normative-doctrinal legal research based on a literature study of the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, the Marriage Law, the Child Protection Law, selected jurisprudence, and scholarly literature. Methods: The data were analyzed qualitatively through systematic interpretation, argumentative construction, and linkage to the factual impact of domestic violence on children. Findings: The results indicate that positive law provides a firm basis for sanctions and protection, including the restriction of interaction and the termination of custody rights. However, implementation is often hampered by the ambiguity in proving psychological abuse, the victim's economic dependence, and the weak enforcement of child support. Effective termination of parental rights is shown to break the cycle only when accompanied by a protection order, a post-judgment parenting plan, and sustained psychosocial support. Conclusion: Policy implications encompass guidelines for proving coercive control, expanding access to time-sensitive protection orders, integrating trauma-informed services within religious courts, and establishing child support enforcement mechanisms that do not burden the victim. Novelty/Originality of this article: Furthermore, schools, public health centers, and communities are highlighted as critical nodes for early detection. Ultimately, the work of law and the social network converge on one simple goal: ensuring that the home once again signifies a safe place of return for the child.