Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi JURNAL PUSTAKA KOMUNIKASI Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences (MIRSHuS) Petanda : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Humaniora Hybrid Advertising Journal: Publication for Advertising Studies Jurnal Komunikasi & Media Digital
Ardan Achmad
Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search
Journal : Wacana: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi

 1   2 
MODEL ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS KOMUNIKASI KRIMINAL CRIMINAL COMMUNICATION CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS MODEL Achmad, Ardan
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 10, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32509/wacana.v10i1.421

Abstract

MODEL ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS KOMUNIKASI KRIMINALCRIMINAL COMMUNICATION CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS MODEL
KOMUNIKASI KRIMINAL SUATU KEBUTUHAN KHUSUS SEBAGAI BIDANG KAJIAN BARU Achmad, Ardan
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 9, No 4 (2010)
Publisher : Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32509/wacana.v9i4.327

Abstract

World was shocked by the October 12, 2001 bombing of terrorist to the world trade center of New York of the United States of America the date in which could be considered as the beginning of intense war of world news on terrorism. Analyses made about the responsible actors, motives for the tragic bombing are all political in character, almost forgetting that the act of bombing basically is a criminal act. Political actors are more intensively interviewed for the analyses than criminologist or lawyers or other relevant experts which ironically the other experts s comments but political actors s are used as a mere supportive political justification, such a politicalccommunication was and has intensively been applied in the situation. The concern rises why the criminal act is analysed/or the first place by its political character not by its criminal character? The political terminologies or concepts are pronounced where criminal concepts are marginalized er are probably not available to use and must be used in relation to the political concepts? So why do not we blend the concepts together to have a new formula of criminal communication? where we can come with the construction of criminal communication with its political dimension, not political communication with its criminal dimension. The first firstly puts an act of crime, and followed by its political character, whereas the second comes with its political character followed by its criminal dimension.
Komunikasi Kriminal : AnalisisResepsi Untuk Melihat Pemaknaan Bagi Kepentingan Pembelaan Achmad, Ardan
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 7, No 23 (2008)
Publisher : Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32509/wacana.v7i23.349

Abstract

The audience has been central in mass communication research from the very beginning. Initially the audience was perceived as an undifferentiated mass, as a passive target for persuasion and information, or as market of consumers of media products. Students of media effects soon came to recognize that actual audiences are made up of real social groups and are characterized by networks of interpersonal relationship through which effects are mediated Audiences can also resist influence in part because they have their own varied reasons for choosing to attend to the media message, or seeing it from criminal communication field, for the sake of defences interest in a court room, an individual, or group of individuals, or to be specifically, a defendant, can give different meanings to a preferred meeninq constructed by media, in line with his or their own interest, particularly in the form of an tdeological resistance interpretation.
Co-Authors Agustianny, Syahra Fauzia Cakraningsih Herry Hermawan, Herry Jeremy, Jordan Jordan Jeremy Kiagung, Muhammad Akbar Kusumasakti, Bramayanti Nilamsari, Natalina Nono Sungkono Ramadhan, Indra Fajar SANDY SAPUTRA Sungkono, Nono Velrahga, Kevino Dwi Vendra Palova