Isadora, Eugenia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DUAL ROLE OF MAGNESIUM IN MIGRAINE: EFFICACY & SAFETY IN TREATMENT AND PREVENTION—A META-ANALYSIS Isadora, Eugenia; Kusuma, Hendrawan Chandra; Prathama, Hans Aditya; Ann, Clara
Acta Neurologica Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 02 (2025): Acta Neurologica Indonesia
Publisher : Departemen Neurologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69868/ani.v3i02.67

Abstract

Introduction: Magnesium deficiency has been associated with migraines, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic intervention. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) and oral magnesium for the treatment and prevention of migraines in adults. Material and methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted across multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving adult migraine patients treated with IV magnesium (1-2g) for acute attacks or oral magnesium (≥8 weeks) for prevention. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.4. Result: Twelve trials were included. IV magnesium showed significant benefits for acute migraines, including better headache response (p = 0.02), reduced pain intensity (p = 0.03), and less rescue medication use (p = 0.02). Oral magnesium was as effective as sodium valproate for prevention but showed limited benefits over placebo for attack frequency (p = 0.09). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common with oral magnesium (p = 0.01). Discussion: Magnesium modulates methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, preventing excessive calcium influx and cortical spreading depression, which are key in migraine pathophysiology. IV magnesium is effective for acute treatment with a favorable safety profile. Oral magnesium shows potential for migraine prevention, with efficacy similar to sodium valproate, though gastrointestinal side effects limit its use. Conclusion: IV magnesium should be considered for acute attacks, while oral magnesium may be an alternative for prophylaxis in patients intolerant to first-line treatments.
Evaluating Brivaracetam As An Adjunctive Therapy For Refractory Focal Onset Seizure: A Meta-Analysis Chandra Kusuma, Hendrawan; Isadora, Eugenia; Putra, Aditya; Kurniawan Sindaka, Jonathan
Acta Neurologica Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 03 (2025): Acta Neurologica Indonesia
Publisher : Departemen Neurologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69868/ani.v3i03.70

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of Brivaracetam (BRV) as an adjunctive therapy for managing focal-onset seizures that are uncontrolled by primary antiseizure medications (ASMs). Method: This review systematically incorporated studies from databases including PubMed, ProQuest, The Lancet, EBSCO and the Cochrane Library. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.4. Result: Seven studies were included, with five qualifying for meta-analysis involving 2,486 patients taking BRV alongside one or more AEDs. The pooled risk ratios for a 50% reduction in seizure frequency and complete seizure freedom were 1.83 (95% confidence interval of 1.60 to 2.08) and 7.52 (95% confidence interval of 3.59 to 15.75), respectively. In terms of safety, the use of adjunctive BRV was linked to significantly higher rates of somnolence (p<0.00001), dizziness (p=0.0001), and fatigue (p=0.0002), along with other drug-related treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) such as headache, irritability and nausea. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the two groups regarding serious adverse effects (SAEs) or the number of patients who withdrew from the study due to drug-related TEAEs or SAEs. Discussion: Adjunctive BRV (50-200 mg daily) notably enhanced efficacy outcomes compared to placebo. While mild to moderate side effects occurred, there were no significant differences in SAEs and withdrawal rate, indicating a favorable safety and tolerability profile that aligns with other adjunctive ASMs. Conclusion: BRV (50–200 mg) is favourable adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled focal-onset seizures.