Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Diponegoro Law Review
Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PROSPEK EKOSIDA SEBAGAI PELANGGARAN BERAT HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei; Savitri, Niken
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/cr5hpg41

Abstract

Ecocide constitutes a major environmental crime driven by power dynamics and carries significant consequences for human life. In the Indonesian context, several environmental incidents, such as river pollution by palm oil industries, the Lapindo mudflow disaster, and gold mining operations in Intan Jaya, Papua, demonstrate the severe and direct impact of environmental harm on communities. This research explores whether such cases in Indonesia can be classified as ecocide and examines whether ecocide should be treated as a serious human rights violation or recognized as a distinct criminal offense. Utilizing a normative-empirical juridical approach, the study concludes that environmental crimes in Indonesia have the potential to be categorized as ecocide and, thus, may qualify as gross human rights violations. Accordingly, two possible regulatory paths are proposed: first, the urgency of ratifying the Rome Statute, should ecocide be included under its jurisdiction as a gross human rights violation; and second, the incorporation of ecocide into Indonesia’s Human Rights Court Law, acknowledging both the potential benefits and challenges of such a legal reform.
PROSPEK EKOSIDA SEBAGAI PELANGGARAN BERAT HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei; Savitri, Niken
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/cr5hpg41

Abstract

Ecocide constitutes a major environmental crime driven by power dynamics and carries significant consequences for human life. In the Indonesian context, several environmental incidents, such as river pollution by palm oil industries, the Lapindo mudflow disaster, and gold mining operations in Intan Jaya, Papua, demonstrate the severe and direct impact of environmental harm on communities. This research explores whether such cases in Indonesia can be classified as ecocide and examines whether ecocide should be treated as a serious human rights violation or recognized as a distinct criminal offense. Utilizing a normative-empirical juridical approach, the study concludes that environmental crimes in Indonesia have the potential to be categorized as ecocide and, thus, may qualify as gross human rights violations. Accordingly, two possible regulatory paths are proposed: first, the urgency of ratifying the Rome Statute, should ecocide be included under its jurisdiction as a gross human rights violation; and second, the incorporation of ecocide into Indonesia’s Human Rights Court Law, acknowledging both the potential benefits and challenges of such a legal reform.
EXPLORING INTERSECTIONALITY: THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED BY INDIGENOUS WOMEN IN PALM OIL LAND CONFLICTS Natalis, Aga; Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei; Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth; Hardiyanti, Marzellina; Putrijanti, Aju
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.173-198

Abstract

This study explores the dual challenges faced by indigenous women in palm oil land conflicts through an intersectionality framework to understand their unique oppression. In Indonesia, the palm oil industry’s expansion has exacerbated gender-based, ethnic, economic, and ecological injustices faced by these women. Indigenous women are often excluded from decision-making processes regarding land disputes and development projects, leading to the loss of vital resources that sustain their livelihoods. This research demonstrates that these women bear an additional burden of domestic responsibilities, which are largely unrecognised, while also being marginalised in the socio-political and legal spheres. Through an intersectional lens, this study unveils the complex interactions of gender, ethnicity, and class, which create distinct forms of oppression, complicating the struggle of indigenous women to protect their land and culture. These conflicts are not simply issuing of agriculture; they represent a broader fight for recognition, autonomy, and the protection of ecosystems. In conclusion, the legal and policy frameworks often fail to adequately address the rights of indigenous women, highlighting the need for inclusive policies that ensure their participation in decision-making processes. It argues for the recognition of their ecological knowledge and cultural heritage in addressing and resolving land conflicts.
Co-Authors Aju Putrijanti Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth Hardiyanti, Marzellina Natalis, Aga Niken Savitri