Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Dhesy A. Kase
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Satuan Pengamanan (SATPAM) sebagai Mitra Kepolisian dalam Penanggulangan Keamanan Ketertiban Masyarakat di Kota Kupang Angerius Agustinus Bria; Korolus Kopong Medan; Dhesy A. Kase
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Administrative and Social Science
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v6i1.2139

Abstract

The authority and role of security guards assist the Police in carrying out security duties in a limited manner. The results of the study show that security guards in carrying out security responsibilities as a partner of the Police in dealing with and limited public order in the city of Kupang such as arresting the perpetrators of iron theft at PT Semen Kupang, Helmet Theft at the Kupang Polytechnic Campus, computer theft at the UKAW Kupang Campus and Oesapa Procurement Office Motorcycle Theft. Obstacles in carrying out duties and authorities as security guards include the authority of security guards which are limited by the law and inadequate facilities and infrastructure. Conclusion on the research Based on the provisions of Law number 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, it gives limited authority 'to security guard members to carry out security in the company environment acting Pre-emptive (fostering, directing), preventive (preventing, counteracting) and as limited law enforcement officers to assist the role of the functions of the National Police in a Repressive, Non-Judicial manner (acting, arresting, handcuffing, conducting initial interrogation) and in carrying out their duties and responsibilities the security guard experiences several obstacles such as the authority of the security guard which is limited by the law when he is in a position to face the perpetrator of the crime of theft who holds a weapon while the security guard officer is not armed because his authority is not like a member of the Police, but if the security guard officer resists it will be suspected that he has committed an unlawful act because of his limited authority and the law and the Facilities and Inadequate infrastructure.
Perbandingan Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Presidensial Threshold di Indonesia Sam Meldrian Althonsius Oematan; Saryono Yohanes; Dhesy A. Kase
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5032

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the Election Law on the presidential and vice presidential nomination threshold. Since the presidential election was held directly, the issue of the threshold for nominating presidential and vice presidential candidates has always surfaced every time a presidential election is held. In 2004, for example, the presidential nomination threshold was 10 percent. This research is a juridical-normative research, namely a process to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced. The data was analyzed descriptively-qualitatively.The results of this study indicate that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74/PUU-XVII/2020 concerning the presidential nomination threshold (Presidential Threshold) is one of the important decisions in the discourse of democracy in Indonesia. The following is an explanation of the Ratio Decidendi of the decision in relation to the concept of democracy: Constitutionality of the Presidential Threshold The Constitutional Court (MK) in its decision emphasized that the presidential threshold or presidential nomination threshold is constitutional. This means that the provisions regarding the threshold do not conflict with the 1945 Constitution. The Constitutional Court is of the opinion that the presidential threshold is an open legal policy (Open Legal Policy) which is the authority of the lawmakers, namely the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President. The purpose of the Presidential Threshold, the Constitutional Court explained that the purpose of the presidential threshold is to simplify the party system and the presidential system, as well as to create government stability. The Ratio Decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74/Puu-XXII/2024, Number 87/Puu-XXII/2024, Number 129/Puu-XXI/2023, Number 131/Puu-XXI 2023 concerning the Presidential Nomination Threshold is the Presidential Threshold is constitutional and does not conflict with the principles of democracy.
Co-Authors Angerius Agustinus Bria Korolus Kopong Medan Sam Meldrian Althonsius Oematan Saryono Yohanes