Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Islamic Legal Perspectives on Rewarding Worship (Īṣāl al-Thawāb) to the Deceased: A Comparative Study of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama Hamdi. R, Khairul; Day, George Soros Setiawan; Fadhlullah, Fathan; Ashufah, Abdul Hayyaqdhan
Al-Risalah VOLUME 25 NO 2, NOPEMBER (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.55225

Abstract

This study examines the contrasting legal perspectives of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) on the practice of bestowing the rewards of worship (īṣāl al-thawāb) to the deceased—an enduring and widespread tradition among many Indonesian Muslims. The purpose of this research is to explore the theological and methodological foundations underlying each organization's stance and to identify the broader implications of these differing views for Islamic legal discourse in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative, comparative approach, the study utilizes literature-based analysis and in-depth interviews to investigate fatwas issued by Muhammadiyah’s Tarjih Council and NU’s Bahtsul Masail. The findings reveal a sharp divergence: Muhammadiyah rejects the practice, considering it unsupported by scriptural evidence and classifying it as bid‘ah (religious innovation), while NU legitimizes the practice based on ijmaʿ (consensus), qiyās (analogy), and long-standing tradition, especially in communal rituals like tahlilan. The originality of this research lies in its focused comparison of the legal reasoning (istinbāṭ al-ḥukm) used by Indonesia’s two largest Islamic organizations, which reflects deeper epistemological tensions between scripturalist and traditionalist orientations in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. The study has broader implications for understanding how Islamic authority is negotiated in pluralistic societies and how divergent methodologies shape religious practices at the grassroots level. These findings contribute to ongoing discussions on the role of legal pluralism, tradition, and reform in shaping Indonesian Islamic identity.
DIVORCE MEDIATION IN MINANGKABAU SOCIETY OF AL-AZHAR   TAFSIR PERSPECTIVE Fathan Fadhlullah; Hamdi. R, Khairul
Familia: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah UIN Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/familia.v6i2.301

Abstract

Marriage which is ideally understood as an eternal bond, has not been fully realized in practice. Data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) indicate an increase in divorce rates in West Sumatra from 2020 to 2022. In 2020, there were 291,677 divorce cases, which rose to 447,743 cases in 2021 and further increased to 516,334 cases in 2022. Mediation, which is expected to be the most effective means of reducing divorce rates, has not yet yielded optimal results. This study aims to analyze divorce mediation in Minangkabau society from the perspective of Tafsir Al-Azhar. The topics discussed include: (1) the concept of divorce mediation in Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Court Mediation, (2) the role of culture in divorce mediation practices within Minangkabau society, and (3) the concept of mediation from the perspective of Tafsir Al-Azhar. The research method used is a normative study with a descriptive analysis approach. The findings indicate that a culturally based approach in the mediation process is a strategic solution that mediators can utilize to optimize the function of mediation. Furthermore, integrating the cultural values of society with the Supreme Court's policies aligns with the mediation concept mandated in the Qur'an, as interpreted by Hamka in Tafsir Al-Azhar.
Perampingan Struktur Kelembagaan Negara: Antara Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Day, George Soros Setiawan; Fatimah, Siti; Hamdi. R, Khairul
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 3 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v5i3.622

Abstract

Fokus dari aritkel ini menyoroti mengenai problematika yang terdapat di lembaga negara dilingkup legislatif dan eksekutif, menilik masih efektif dan efisiennya lembaga-lembaga negara tersebut. Selanjutnya, apakah perlu perampingan suatu lembaga dalam melihat efektivitas dan efisiensi dengan melihat pemerintahan saat ini, serta menawarkan model atas perampingan lembaga negara. penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menekankan pada studi kepustakaan dan analisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan. Dalam hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: yang pertama, terdapat dua problematika yang menjadi fokus dikelembagaan negara saat ini mulai dari tugas dan wewenang yang sudah tidak efektif dilingkup kelembagaan legislatif sampai penambahan lembaga yang cenderung tidak efisien dilingkup eksekutif (kementerian); yang kedua, prinsip form follows function “bentuk mengikuti fungsi” menjadi landasan dalam mendesain lembaga-lembaga negara yang masih problemtik; dan yang ketiga, perampingan lembaga negara sangat penting dilaksanakan oleh pemangku kewenangan dengan tawaran model meleburkan lembaga-lembaga yang menjadi problematik sebelumnya, agar efektifitas dan efisiensi dapat terasa oleh masyarakat. The focus of this article highlights the problems that exist in state institutions in the legislative and executive circles, looking at the effectiveness and efficiency of these state institutions. Furthermore, whether it is necessary to downsize an institution in terms of effectiveness and efficiency by looking at the current government, as well as offering a model for downsizing state institutions. the writing of this journal uses normative juridical research methods, emphasizing literature study and analysis of relevant laws and regulations. In the results of the study, it can be concluded that: first, there are two problems that are the focus of the current state institutions, ranging from ineffective duties and authorities within the legislative institutions to the addition of institutions that tend to be inefficient within the executive (ministries); second, the principle of form follows function "form follows function" becomes the basis for designing state institutions that are still problematic; and third, downsizing state institutions is very important to be implemented by the authorities by offering a model of merging institutions that have become problematic before, so that effectiveness and efficiency can be felt by the community.